Archive for March, 2009

Pro-War Obama Fooled Me Too

March 23, 2009

By Christian Peper

Like most Americans, I held out the hope that Barack Obama would be at least slightly less militarist than the tyrant George W. Bush.  (I spit on the ground at the mention of Bush.)  Another part of me said, “Kennedy (a Democrat) broke away from the New World Order to serve the people; why can’t Obama be like Kennedy?”  I thought, “Maybe Obama will follow in Kennedy’s footsteps and try to make real change to the elite controlled system.”  Sadly, I was mistaken.  While we hoped for Kennedy, we got Stalin.  All evidence thus far points to America’s worst nightmare.  While giving away taxpayers money to the banker elite is inexcusable; mass murder of the innocent through continuing and expanding illegal wars is the ultimate sin against God and mankind.                                                                                                                                           

According to Adam Kokesh, who serves on the board of directors of the anti-war group “Iraq Veterans Against the War” (IVAW): “President Barack Obama’s war policies in Iraq and Afghanistan are criminal and worse than those of former President Bush”[1]  He went on to say: “In some ways, Obama is worse than Bush,” Kokesh told  “Bush wasn’t proposing a surge in Afghanistan – and Bush was talking about a quicker timeline for withdrawal than Obama.”  He went on to say: “What Obama is doing with our foreign policy on a fundamental level is not change.  Though we are going to re-label the troops ‘non-combat troops,’ they are still out there, and clearly they are still fighting for American interests.”[2]  

 Sadly, the evidence shows that everything Adam Kokesh says is true.  Great press is made about the decision by Obama to “Withdraw” US  troops from Iraq  by 2010 but little is said about the permanent military bases that will remain in Iraq indefinitely.  Obama never had plans to completely withdraw the US troops from Iraq.  Up to 50,000 US troops will remain in Iraq through 2011[3].  Realistically, US troops will NEVER leave Iraq because a huge new US embassy that’s the size of Vatican City must be maintained and protected.  [4]                                           

Jeremy Scahill had this to say about the residual force that will remain in Iraq:I’ve long spoken out against this residual force, and there are many activist groups in this country that, when Obama was running for president, called his office and said, ‘No residual forces remaining in Iraq.’  The scope of the mission of these residual forces, while it sounds specific to some—phrases such as ‘counterterrorism’ have become almost meaningless in the America we now live in when uttered by politicians.”[5]                                                                                                                       

The troop surge in Afghanistan that has already led to mass civilian causalities is arousing and titillating for many Americans because Obama is so attractive and charismatic.  The occupation force in Afghanistan will be doubled from 30,000 to over 60,000 in the next year.[6]         

Most Americans are not aware that Barack Obama has started a new war in Pakistan.  This new war is being conducted using remote controlled drones.  These remote controlled drones have been firing missiles and killing civilians since the start of his administration.  Of course, Americans do not care about this; many think it is funny that a mother in Pakistan loses her children while the children of American women get to go to soccer practice.  Imagine the glee the killers in the US Armed Services feel when they play a video game that kills real people!  Such sweet relish!  Perhaps this is why video games are promoted by the US Military so heavily in malls across America.[7] Now that children are good at these video games perhaps they can start enjoying the death sacrament that the adults in the US Military enjoy so thoroughly.                     

Before the elections, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton attended the 2008 Bilderberg meeting without telling the American people.[8] Campaign spokesmen Robert Gibbs  admitted the  Democratic candidates convened at “An event in Northern Virginia”.[9] This “event” was the scene of the 2008 Bilderberg meeting.  “Reporters traveling with Obama sensed something might be happening between the pair when they arrived at Dulles International Airport after an event in Northern Virginia and Obama was not aboard the airplane,” reports the Associated Press.[10]

The Bilderberg Group is a secret organization of the elite that, in partnership with other secret organizations, seeks complete control over mankind.  Again, both parties are pro-elite and pro-death at higher levels.  I am ashamed I did see through Obama’s mask sooner.                   

Obama is deliberately sinking the US economy to further enrich the elite.  Not only has he lied about eliminating NAFTA, he wants to increase the number of immigrants that will take American jobs.  While I am very uncomfortable with the racist tendencies of many of those that oppose immigration; Obama’s immigration policy is constructed to use South American immigrants to take financial power (and by extension the power to resist tyrannical government) from the American people.  This is also why he wants an unarmed US population.  A nation of poor, unarmed slaves is the ultimate goal of the elite.                                                                 

Barack Obama will disappoint even those that were hoping for socialism.  Taking tax money from the people to give to the billionaire bankers and increasing military and police state spending (now even the police have tanks) is not true socialism.  Around 75 % of your federal tax money will go for military and police state spending (assuming budget deficits are ignored) under Obama so it is intellectually dishonest to pretend that Obama really cares about social programs.  Obama will also run a mammoth deficit that is designed to bring the American people to their knees.                                                                                                                                                 

Obama works for the globalists who have bankrupted America by design.  Poor people make much better slaves than rich ones.  $9.7 Trillion Has already been given to the greedy elite bankers and this number keeps rising.  According to an article by Don Miller: “$9.7 Trillion would be enough to send a $1,430 check to every man, woman and child alive in the world”, (Bloomberg reported).  “And it’s almost enough to pay off every home mortgage loan in the United States, calculated at $10.5 trillion by the Federal Reserve.”[11]                                                

Because a war abroad is, by necessity, a war at home, Barack Obama has continued in the path of George Bush with the persecution of the American people.  Obama has declared support for H.R. 6304.  This allows the warrantless wiretapping of American citizens.  This is an affront to God because it puts the police / intelligence agencies into the position of judging men’s hearts rather than reserving judgment for God.  True spirituality represents the freedom of all men.  False religion, like the false Christianity promoted by the Republican Party and some democrats puts the power of God into man’s hands.  False Christianity pushes people away from God rather than to him.  This is why Europe now rejects Christianity; because they lived through the inquisition.[12]                                                                                                                                

Obama’s nominees endorsed continuing the practice of “extraordinary rendition”.  Under “extraordinary rendition” prisoners are allowed to be transferred  to other countries that allow harsh (torture) interrogation methods.[13]   Terrorism suspects can also be detained without trials even if they were arrested far from a war zone.[14] (Like in America.)  Obama plans mass arrests in the near future for anti-war and anti-police state activists.  The National Emergency Centers Act, or H.R. 645, mandates the establishment of “national emergency centers” to be located on military installations.[15]                                                                                                            

Many Americans secretly think Barack Obama has supernatural powers.  Some claim that his voice heals the sick.  I am becoming increasingly uncomfortable with these claims.  If Obama does indeed have these powers, where do they come from?  Are any of his supernatural powers available for evil purposes?  His power of persuasion certainly seems supernatural.  If his power of persuasion is supernatural than this creates an unfair advantage in the political arena.  Just as it would be unfair and unsporting for Superman to play football for the Chicago Bears; Obama should not be allowed to use his supernatural powers on the American people without their knowledge and consent.                                                                                                                    

Obama is warping the minds of America; making everyone from leftist soccer moms to the hip-hop generation love war and the police state.  Because people love Obama, they second guess themselves and say: “Perhaps the US troops should stay in Iraq to keep the peace; perhaps the Patriot Act, warrantless wiretapping, and a police state is needed to keep America safe.”  Obama was brought in to put on fresh, attractive, face on warmongering.  An old bait and switch technique elevated Obama to power and now he has significantly deflated the anti-war movement while increasing war.  This is the ultimate betrayal.                                                                                 

Obama can get away with killing the darker skinned people of the world in a way Bush could not.  Given Americas tragic history of slavery; Who wouldn’t want a person of color to be successful as president?  Because Barack Obama is seen as a hero like Martin Luther King among blacks; he will warp them to enjoy military torture and wars as much as sick, middle class white America.  No, Obama is no Martin Luther King.  Obama should not be mentioned in the same breath as Martin Luther King.  Martin Luther King stood for life, Obama stands for death.  Obama will bring more black Americas to the prison planet Hell (inhabited by alien / demons) after they cross over to the next dimension.  Playing on petty tribal differences of race to increase the population of Hell is certainly no great gift to black America.                                                                       

A quote from an article entitled “What have we done?”  by James Taranto[16] illustrates Americas radical disconnect from true participatory democracy: “Nearly 60 million Americans might respond, ‘don’t blame me, I voted for McCain.’  But they don’t, because honestly, no one really thinks America made the wrong decision in voting against john McCain.”  The article goes on to say:  “Similarly, no matter how unhappy people got with George W. Bush, no one ever said, ‘Things would be better if only John Kerry were president”  To summarize the article: Both candidates are essentially the same.                                                                                                            

The election of Barack Obama was a good thing so far as it was a rejection of the George Bush wars and the fascist police state; it is a tragedy that this good thing went so horribly wrong.  Obama sucked the wind out of the anti-war movement.  At least with Bush the common man spoke out against the injustice of war and the police surveillance state  but now the left, the queer, the blacks; in short, the underclass, largely support the same foreign policy that they decried when Bush was president.  This is why the elite promoted Obama; to be the (false) “change” America wanted.  Already anti-war demonstrations are scarcely attended even though American military intervention in the world has increased since Obama took office.                

I would like to close with a quote from “Arms and the Man” by Bernard Shaue[17] “Oh yes: quite a romance!  He was serving in the very battery I so unprofessionally charged.  Being a thorough soldier, he ran away like the rest of them, with our cavalry at his heels.”  Ultimately, Barack Obama is nothing but a deceiving murderous coward just like Bush.  Yes, I am ashamed of myself for believing Obama’s lies.  A loving God does exist.  God forgive America.




[1] Josiah Ryan, Staff Writer, “Obama’s War Policies Worse than Bush’s, Anti-War Activist Says”, Friday, March 20, 2009


[2] Josiah Ryan, Staff Writer, “Obama’s War Policies Worse than Bush’s, Anti-War Activist Says”, Friday, March 20, 2009

[3] Amy Goodman, Jeremy Scahill,  Lawrence Korb, “Despite Celebrated Speech, Has Obama Really Ordered an End to US Occupation of Iraq?”, Democracy Now!, March 4, 2009

[4] Amy Goodman, Jeremy Scahill,  Lawrence Korb, Despite Celebrated Speech, Has Obama Really Ordered an End to US Occupation of Iraq?, Democracy Now!, March 4, 2009

[5] Amy Goodman, Jeremy Scahill,  Lawrence Korb, Despite Celebrated Speech, Has Obama Really Ordered an End to US Occupation of Iraq?, Democracy Now!, March 4, 2009

[6] Barry Grey, “Obama set to launch military “surge” in Afghanistan”, February 2009

[7] Jon Hurdle, U.S. “Army recruiting at the mall with videogames”, Jan 9, 2009                                                                                       

[8] Alex Jones, “The Obama Deception” DVD

[9] Paul Joseph Watson, “Hillary & Obama In Secret Bilderberg Rendezvous”, Prison Planet,  Friday, June 6, 2008

[10] Paul Joseph Watson, “Hillary & Obama In Secret Bilderberg Rendezvous”, Prison Planet,  Friday, June 6, 2008

[11]  Don Miller “9.7 Trillion Pledge Could Have Fixed 90% of Mortages”, Feb 10th, 2009

[12] Gregory A. Boyd, The Myth of a Christian Nation       

[13] Charlie Savage, “Obama’s war on terror may resemble Bush’s”,  February 18, 2009

[14] Charlie Savage, “Obama’s war on terror may resemble Bush’s”,  February 18, 2009

[15] Paul Joseph Watson,

New Legislation Authorizes F.E.M.A. Camps In The United States, Prison, 27 January, 2009


[16] James Taranto, “ What Have We Done?”, The Wall Street Journal

[17] Bernard Shaue , Arms and the Man


Why I Call Myself a Left Libertarian 75%

March 19, 2009

By Christian Peper

People often ask me what type of government I want. I get blank stares when I say that I want a small government. Due to the media and academic brainwashing of the American people, most would assume my desire for a smaller government makes me a radical right-winger or even a (GASP!) Republican. This is simply not the case.

Ironically, the radical left represents smaller government better than the mainstream right. How can I make such a statement? The true issue that is ignored by virtually all opponents of big government is the high cost of military and police state spending.

While all US presidents since the assassination of John F. Kennedy have been heavily controlled by the New World Order death machine; neo-conservatives beginning with Ronald Reagan have continuously pushed for radically increased big government military industrial complex spending. This is not to say that every US president has been universally bad. Jimmy Carter (and possibly Obama) immediately come to mind as “better” presidents. Regardless of how “good” their intentions, after the military industrial complex killed Kennedy, US presidents knew to keep their “change” within narrowly defined parameters. It is unlikely that the new president, Barack Obama, will step outside the narrowly defined boundaries of “acceptable change”. If he does he will share Kennedy’s fate.

Consider this quote from left libertarian thinker and political philosopher Brad Spangler: “Among the variety of political labels I claim for myself is ‘Left Libertarian’. That should, however, be a redundancy and I believe that it will come to be regarded as such. Genuine libertarianism is very much left wing. It’s revolutionary. The long and tragic alliance of libertarians with the right against the specter of state socialism is coming to a close, as it served no purpose after the fall of the Soviet Union and so-called ‘conservatives’ have subsequently taken to letting their true big-government-on-steroids colors fly.”

According to the War Resisters League, 54% of the federal income tax budget for 2009 will be spent on the military and only 46% will be spent on non-military expenditures. While I have great admiration for the War Resisters League for refusing to be a party to murder (Like most killer Americans) their numbers do not tell the full story of the military-police-state of America.

I contend that over 75% of federal tax money goes for military and police state apparatus. The War Resisters League focuses only on the military but ignores the fact that the line between the US military and domestic law enforcement is becoming increasingly blurred. Journalist and former state police trooper Greg Evensen had this to say in an article entitled “The Militarization of the American Police”: “We have become accustomed to standing quietly on the sidelines while our local police Chiefs and Sheriffs have accepted huge amounts of federal dollars and military equipment for their special response units.”

Claiming that police tanks, helicopters, and machine guns are non-military expenditures is ludicrous. If one wants to calculate the true cost of the military / police state one must include everything from the fighter jets that dropped the bombs on the innocent in Iraq (God bless the Islamic Jihad) to the cameras on the street corners, to the machine guns the police now carry. One must also include expenditures that have greatly increased since the fraudulent “War on Terror” (911 Inside Job) such as increased funds for the DEA, BATF, IRS, and other terrorist organizations. Because over 75% of federal tax money goes for military and police state apparatus, it makes sense to start cutting there if one wants to shrink the government.

Welfare takes only a small fraction of the total money spent on military and police state apparatus like tanks and guns. Welfare and social programs represent indirect fascism while prisons, tanks, and bombs represent direct fascism. While it is far better to drain the state’s money to pay for social programs like welfare so the state can’t spend the money on war; welfare should be opposed by the freedom movement unless, and this is key, it is used as a method to drain funds from the hands of militaristic and enslaving regimes. Welfare and social programs are wonderful, yes wonderful, to the extent that they drain funds that could be used for new prisons, tanks, and bombs. It is morally acceptable, for instance, to commit welfare fraud during a time of war if one genuinely believes that the money taken from the government in the form of welfare payments will reduce the capacity of the state to fund the war effort.

I am against both big business and big government. Imagine the silly right-wing Libertarians that cry and whine about property rights but cringe in horror when you say that you want to screw someone under 21. Right-wing Libertarians have put their loyalty to the party ahead of their dedication to spread freedom. They ignore the role institutions of oppression play in the theft of freedom and instead focus only on the government. True, the government is the primary thief of man’s freedom, but large cults and global corporations are rapidly catching up.

Freedom fighter Theodore Kaczynski had this to say about the role of big business in the in the theft of man’s freedom: “Conservatives’ efforts to decrease the amount of government regulation are of little benefit to the average man.” The “Unabomber’s Manifesto” goes on to say: “For another thing, most of the deregulation affects business rather than the average individual, so that its main effect is to take power from the government and give it to private corporations. What this means for the average man is that government interference in his life is replaced by interference from big corporations, which may be permitted, for example, to dump more chemicals into his water supply and give him cancer. The conservatives are just taking the average man for a sucker, exploiting his resentment of Big Government to promote the power of Big Business.”

It is silly indeed to pretend that “free markets” exist when the billionaire elite own most of the nation’s wealth and essentially control large business and the political process. Imperial capitalism is necessarily pro-war because the military is needed to gain new markets and secure resources. Traditional liberals don’t realize that the billionaire elites are not adversely affected by taxes and regulation but the middle class and the common rich are. Unrestricted small business is the only way America can prosper.

Since the “Inside Job” of September 11, 2001 has occurred, law enforcement and the military has gradually expanded to the point where the very economy of America is dependent on war and prisons. Because a war-prison economy is naturally unproductive and hateful, Americas place in the world has fallen. Shame on the US Troops and police of all colors for enabling fascism by their cowardly support of the system.

The freedom movement must not fall into the Republican trap of condemning social spending while ignoring the fact that most federal tax money goes for military and police state apparatus. The US soldier is the ultimate welfare queen. While I am personally against social programs like welfare, complaining about nickels and dimes spent on school lunch programs while trillions are spent for war is the height of hypocrisy. Remember, 75% of your federal tax money goes for hard fascism.

Bibliography and Further Reading:

Charles Murray, What It Means to Be a Libertarian David Boaz, The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Writings from Lao Tzu to Milton Friedman

Theodore Kaczynski, Unabomber’s Manifesto