Archive for the ‘SEXUAL REPRESSION’ Category

Is Avatar Movie Mass Mind Control?

July 16, 2010

By Christian Peper

After hearing reports about the many cases of depression and suicide associated with the movie “Avatar”, I felt the need to see the movie for myself.  After paying for a ticket, I was given strange black plastic 3-D glasses.  These 3-D glasses were different from the old style 3-D glasses I had used in my youth.  Avatar is a different kind of 3-D movie.  It takes at least some time to adjust to the glasses and the film but once the adjustment occurs, the viewing experience is quite enjoyable.  While the older 3-D movies have an exaggerated, almost plastic quality to them, the imagery in Avatar is advanced, beautiful, and life like once one gets through the first half hour of the film.  Although the film is quite entertaining, my knowledge of the New World Order prevented me from becoming fully immersed in the Avatar experience.

The most prominent message promoted by Avatar was a warped interpretation of the Gaia earth theory.  According to the Gaia earth theory the earth is a self-regulating system and living organisms form symbiotic living patterns.[1]  The Gaia earth theory explains the symbiotic relationship between humans and the psilocybin mushroom.[2]  I believed in the Gaia earth theory when I was a New Ager.  Now that I am a Liberated Christian I have modified this belief greatly. I personally believe that humanity is indeed connected to the earth but this connection should never be made in the form of the corporate, governmental, and financial solutions promoted by the New World Order.  It is key to my belief system that we should not put the worship of nature before our love for mankind; neither should we turn a blind eye to the reality that most environmental pollution comes from the US military and large global corporations.  Small business aren’t the problem, big business are.  Obama’s cap and trade will hurt small business while letting the big companies and the military industrial complex pollute.  This is a fake environmental movement that will only further enrich the elite while expanding restricting freedom.  The old car down the street that burns oil or the small business that cleans people’s carpets is not the real polluter; big corporations and the military industrial complex are.  Given the choice between saving an obscure plant or animal and saving a small businessperson’s livelihood the small businessperson should always take precedent (within reason).  Government actions that restrict freedom or reduce the human population such as China’s one child policy are constantly justified by the mantra: “save the environment”.  I believe this is very wrong.

The Gaia earth theory should not be used as an excuse to restrict small business or individuals because the primary destroyer of the earth’s environment is the multinational corporations, big government, and the military industrial complex.  According to an article by Matthew Nasuti entitled “The American Military is Creating an Environmental Disaster in Afghanistan”[3], the U.S. military uses massive burn pits to dispose of everything from electronics to medical waste.  This creates huge toxic fog that has caused cancer in retuning vets and death among the local Afghan population.  The U.S. military also uses depleted uranium rounds that have turned much of the Middle East into a radioactive soup.[4]  So much for “winning the hearts and minds”.

If the Gaia earth theory is taken to its radical conclusion, the planet itself will fight back against any threat to its survival.  The killing of other sentient beings (people) is justified to save the earth according to the followers of the radical extreme view of the Gaia earth theory that is promoted in the movie.  Avatar promoted this theory when the animals on Pandora fought back against the invading Marines.  Viewing the earth as a conscious entity is popular among those that support the New World Order.  Because they put the environment before humanity, naturally they hope for a disaster that will kill off most humans.

Already medication and technologies are available that will radically extend human life.  Contrary to popular belief, it is not necessary to have the technology to extend human life all at once.  If there are only small advances in life extension technology, the elites can live for thousands of years.  All that is necessary is the technology to extend human life for a few years.  During those few years, technology will come along to extend life even further.  Using this method, the elites can leap frog their war to immorality, riding out each technological innovation.  Because they follow a warped view of the Gaia earth theory, the elites plan to kill off the “useless eaters” soon so they can have the earth’s natural resources for their selves.  The elites even took the time to carve their plans in stone and display them for the world to see because they know that the common man (you and me) is too distracted by movies, games, television, and celebrity gossip to do anything about it.  The Georgia Guidestones are a huge stone monument that is located in Elbert County, Georgia.  This monument has a stone inscription that states the following aims:[5] “Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” and “Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.”[6] Because there are over 6.5 billion people on the earth today, the elites plan to kill off most humans.  The radical environmentalists view themselves as smarter than everyone else so they are sure that the elites will allow them to live.  Personally, I love the environment but I love humanity even more.  I am a follower of parts of the Gaia earth theory to some small extent but I put my love for my fellow man before man-made laws and the environment as Jesus commands.  Matthew 22:36-40 states:

36Master, which is the great commandment in the law?  37Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.  38This is the first and great commandment. 39And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.  40On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets[7]

I worship God by partaking in something created by the earth, which is the true communion known as Psilocybin mushrooms.  Sure, some call this gift from God shrooms, magic mushrooms, or even a drug but I call Psilocybin mushrooms sacred.

In world of Pandora, the plant life is seen as evil and almost sinful by the US Marines.  The US government has declared that the traditional communion (the psilocybin mushroom) used for thousands of years by the Central American Indians is sinful and thus illegal.[8]  In the movie the corporate leader jokes that everything in Pandora is sacred and “throw a stick and it lands on a sacred fern”.  Like the marines on Pandora, those in American law enforcement view traditional religions with contempt.  Although freedom of religion is the most basic constitutional right, DEA agents and police know that in the new America they are the masters and the common man is essentially a slave.  Slaves have no rights and neither do most Americans.  Am I really a bad person becaue I practice a slightly different faith than most Americans? Am I a sinner worthy of prison because I take an active communion rather than a piece of bread?  Those of us that use psilocybin mushrooms as a religious sacrament do not belong in prisons.  Religious discrimination against those that take the mushroom communion is morally wrong.  Police and DEA agents have no right to tell Americans what religion they should practice.

Those that have become depressed and suicidal after watching Avatar should realize that this physical plane can be every bit as beautiful as the world in Avatar if only they eat the true communion.  Some have said that the world that can be seen under the influence of psilocybin mushrooms is a false world.  This is simply not true, the world as seen under the influence of magic mushrooms is every bit as real, perhaps more real than the current world.  Like adjusting the knob on a radio, psilocybin mushrooms adjust the frequency at which the world is viewed.  If we adjust the frequency enough we can see real aliens.

In the world of Pandora, the lead female scientist, Dr. Grace Augustine, said that there are many potential cures in the jungle that will be destroyed if the marines move in and start slashing and burning.  In America, many cures are strictly forbidden because they have the potential to allow people to be free of the pharmaceutical monopoly.

Like the sacred tree in Avatar, magic mushrooms can be used effectively to treat everything from depression to autism but, because they are deemed to be “sinful” (and thus illegal) their use is strictly prohibited even by adults over 21.  Possession of bioactive Hemp oil is a serious offence even though it has been shown to cure skin cancer.  Possession of psilocybin mushrooms is a felony even though psilocybin mushrooms are the original sacrament and are an effective treatment for depression, autism, and OCD.  Of course, American Law enforcement enjoys “busting down” the sick and those that dare to practice a religion that is not officially approved by the state.

The fraudulent “war on terror” effectively started when the US military industrial complex pulled off the mass murder on 9-11-2001.  In the movie Avatar, several large trees, the size of buildings, burned and collapsed just like the twin towers and building seven fell on 9-11-2001.  This was amusing because trees would be even more likely to burn than buildings.  Of course, 9-11 was an inside job perpetrated by the military industrial complex to bring about the Mideast wars and take away people’s rights.  While Avatar offers the imagery of the collapsing trees  to the audience, it does not explain that buildings do not collapse in a “pancake” demolition after catching fire, they  more slowly burn.[9] Avatar does not in any way explain or hint that the “inside job” on 9-11-2001 started the great war against humanity known as the “war on terror”.

An important quote delivered by the lead character and hero, Jake Sully was: “I was a warrior who dreamed he could bring peaceSooner or later though, you always have to wake up.”  In the movie Avatar, the U.S. Marine Corps are portrayed as mercenaries waging a war against a humble, religious population that has committed no crime other than living on top of valuable resources.

The marines on Pandora did not care about the mass killing to the youth when they bombed the alien’s tree village.  Similarly, the U.S. military doesn’t care about killing the youth when using remote controlled drones to bomb the villages into submission.  It is strange indeed that here at home Americans want to “save the children” from sexual immorality with sex offender lists and excessive prison time for minor sexual offences but doesn’t care about “saving the children” that die in Iraq or Afghanistan.  Bloodthirsty Americans say no to sex but yes to mass murder.

Like the fraudulent wars in the Middle East, the war against the blue aliens of Pandora was conducted to steal natural resources so the ultra rich could prosper.  Like the war on Pandora, the war in Iraq is also conducted by mercenaries.  By 2008 there were around 190,000 contractors in Iraq.  [10] Of these 190,000, the pentagon estimates that 25,000 are mercenaries.  The GAO estimate is 48,000.  Other researchers put the estimate above 75,000.[11]  There is deliberate ignorance about the true number of hired killers in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere because the American people enjoy the blood (murder fetishes are common) and profits that war produces but not the fine details.  Because the business of hiring mercenaries is seen as seedy and corrupt, the US defense department is more than happy to fudge the numbers.  While the movie appears to have a strong anti-war message, the solution to the militaristic wars is the “new age” more commonly known as the “New World Order”.

The lead character, Jake, unites the planet against the “sky people” towards the end of the movie.  He rides in on a dragon to save the day.  This is like the antichrist riding in on the wings of a dragon (Lucifer).  I am not accusing the movie writers of planning this “coincidence” consciously but, because we are all tapped into the universal mind, we see the past, present, and future subconsciously.  The villain of the movie, Pandora military commander Col Miles Quaritch, pilots a ship that looks like an alien saucer.  This is to acclimate us to alien saucers.  It is likely that flying saucers are used by the aliens / demons to cross over into our dimension.  The aliens /demons are in the dimension next to us.  The entering of Jake into the world of the avatar represents entering the alien dimension where the demons live.

The aliens of Avatar are blue and tall and take control over the humans at the end of the movie.  This is to acclimate us to the idea of the aliens returning in biblical end times to rule over humanity.  Of course, the aliens in the bible are really demons.  This is the end time’s deception of Lucifer.  The aliens/demons that will soon show themselves on this physical plane will present themselves as powerful beings that deserve to be respected and obeyed.  The alien-human hybrids will soon be destroyed in the upcoming tribulation that will occur very soon.

The half-alien half-human “avatar” that was created by the scientists was put in the movie to acclimate the population to alien / human hybrids.  In Genesis 6:1-4 we read of the aliens that polluted the human gene pool by mating with the earth women:

1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,

2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also [is] flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.

4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare [children] to them, the same [became] mighty men which [were] of old, men of renown.[12]

The aliens from the other dimension influence the elite in the physical world because the elite are part alien.  Some are so high in their alien blood that they have taken on characteristics of the reptilian aliens.  The alien-human hybrids walk among us.  Evidence of breeding programs can be found all over the world.  Many women have become pregnant after strange alien encounters only to be re-abducted and have the fetus stolen.

Avatar promotes the same rigid restrictive sexuality that has historically been promoted by fascist movements.  Many scientific studies have shown that sexual repression causes violence yet the American legal system continues to punish those that date the young or hire prostitutes.  According to laboratory studies conducted by of Harry F. and Margaret K. Harlow at the University of Wisconsin, monkeys deprived of physical contact become violent.  Like Americans that are sexually repressed, the monkeys displayed self-destructive behavior.[13]

In the Avatar movie, the myth of the asexual adolescent is promoted.  The alien characters in Avatar are well into adulthood before the mate.  It is wrong to promote this myth of the “pure” youth because scientific studies have shown that late virgins have more sexual problems than those that have sexual relations in early adolescence.  According to researchers at Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, those that lose their virginity later are likely to suffer from  sexual dysfunction.[14] Those who wait until 21 or later to loose their virginity face a high likelihood of sexual problems.[15] This study was in the American Journal of Public Health (January 2008 issue).

Relations between men and women is better in Avatar.  Relations between men and women are so bad in the real world that many single men choose to have homosexual relations rather than compete for the limited number of women that are only looking for money and can only offer disappointing, prude sex.  Sadly, the married or “mated” alien characters in Avatar do not swing with other couples.  Like most Americans, (especially here in the Midwest) the aliens are quite sexually boring.  This is the same reason most American marriages fail.  If more married couples would swing with other married couples there would be less divorce.  Swinging is a good choice for Christians.  According in the New Testament Jesus replaced the old laws of the prophets with the law of love.  This is clearly illustrated in the Sermon on the Mount with the “six antitheses” found in Mathew 5:21-48.  Jesus actually contrasted his words with Gods old words as reflected in the Old Testament.  Jesus also contradicted the old rules of God in the Old Testament with his actions.  As Christians, we are to follow Jesus by realizing that rules no longer exist and all laws are replaced with the law of love.[16]

Avatar the movie would not exist without the same technology that has made the New World Order a reality.  Contrary to popular belief, the aliens in Avatar are not cartoons.  They are computer-generated beings.  When an actor moves his or her body, the computer sensors cause the aliens in the Avatar movie to move.  When the actors changed their facial expressions, the aliens in Avatar changed theirs.  Special cameras were even used that displayed in their computer screen the world of Pandora superimposed over the real world.  This way when an actor moved the directors could see the action that occurred in the virtual reality of Pandora in live time.

Like the world of Pandora that is visited by the wheelchair bound man after his soul is downloaded into the strong alien body, many youths today are now little more than avatars that play in the “real” world of video games.  Already many live more of their lives in virtual reality video games then in the real world.  Perhaps soon people will get their souls downloaded into a virtual reality digital video game.

The wheelchair bound main character, Jake, says in the movie that he feels that the avatar world is more real than the real world.  The new world order elite want the human rights activists to waste their time playing video games and watching movies like Avatar rather than fighting for freedom and justice.

An excellent summary of the reason for the creation of Avatar was offered on the Alex Jones website by a poster reviewing an article called “Avatar banned in China”.  This article comes from “yahoo movies” and was dated January 19, 2010.[17]  The reviewer used the Hegelian dialectic[18] “problem reaction, solution” template for determining the purpose of the Avatar event.[19]  In his commentary about the movie, the poster “bllllllaaaaaaaahhhhhhh” said on January 19, 2010 at 3:50 pm:

“AVATAR is NWO propaganda to glorify the New Age.

Problem: The Neocon war machine and Empire.

Reaction: The peasants want the wars of aggression to stop.
Solution: The New Age Agenda is introduced.”[20]

While the mind control in Avatar goes much deeper than simply promoting the new age (New World Order), this summary of Avatar is quite accurate.  Avatar is an excellent movie, is very entertaining, and has many good messages in it.  Rat poison is also sweet and enjoyed by many rats before they die.

[1] Helen Ellerbe, The Dark Side of Christian History, p.176

[2] O.T. Oss & O.N. Oeric, Psilocybin Magic Mushroom Grower’s Guide

[3] Matthew Nasuti, The American Military is Creating an Environmental Disaster in Afghanistan,

[4] Scott Peterson, “Depleted Uranium Haunts Kosovo and Iraq”, Middle East Report






[10] Steve Fainaru, America’s Mercenaries Fighting In Iraq, p. 24

[11] Steve Fainaru, America’s Mercenaries Fighting In Iraq, p. 22







[18] Popularized by david icke




Why I (Sexual Libertine) Criticize Closet Cases

September 18, 2008

By Christian Peper

(I have come to the conclusion that prude women make men gay. Churches that encourage women to be prude through repressive teaching are promoting homosexuality. Homosexuality is NOT automatically a sin because Jesus replaced all laws with the law of love;   BUT prude women sin by being prude and gay men are not happy.)

I support all alternative sexual practices (within reason) that are consensual, yet I have harsh words for closet cases THAT SPREAD REPRESSION.  I, as a sexual freedom fighter, have harsh words for certain individuals that engage in alternative sexual activities because closet cases that spread sexual repression are responsible for most of the intolerant fascism seen today.  Closet cases come in all shapes and stripes.  Many are gay but certainly not all. Some closet cases come in the form of US Congress men who cross dress.  Other closet cases are the “moral” and “godly” soccer mom that votes Republican and gossips about “sluts” in the beauty parlor yet frequents swing sex clubs on the weekends.  Other closet cases are Baptist preachers that campaign from the pulpit to raise the age of consent to 21 while having unconsensual sex with five year olds.

All of these “closet cases” spread sexual fascism and intolerance yet enjoy some alternative sexual lifestyle.  In the case of the Baptist preacher I would say that pedophiles are far more prevalent in Christian churches than in the general population. This is not to say that all Christians abuse children. I consider myself a very liberal Christian.   As a very liberal Christian I feel that Jesus was the greatest example of one who criticized the religious and government leaders of the day.  This is why I criticize those that spread sexual repression. 

I also believe that the current age of consent laws are silly and pointless and that all numerical age of consent laws should be replaced with puberty as a GUIDE to an individual’s readiness for sexual relations.  I also believe that safe sex education should begin as early as possible. 

Safer sex practices such as oral sex have the potential to save many lives.  It is upsetting indeed that the majority of Americans think that oral sex is as dangerous as unprotected anal sex.  The majority of Americans do not even realize that a risk continuum for different types of sexual contact even exists.  To shed light on the previous statement, oral sex has been shown to be all but harmless.  Another great myth that is spread by the repressive closet cases is that AIDS is harmful and deadly for every one.  This is not the case.  AIDS is completely harmless for many (though not all) whites.  As a government created bio weapon, the immunity to AIDS is not shared among the brown and black of the world. I encourage the reader to study some of my research in this area as this subject is far to complicated to address here.  In conclusion, closet cases spread sexual repression, sexual repression spreads fascism, and fascism inevitably results in ignorance and even death.   FREEDOM FOREVER


AIDS is Sometimes Harmless, Sometimes Deadly

September 18, 2008

 By Christian Peper


I am writing this to educate the public and to clarify my position on the AIDS “harmful or harmless” issue.  AIDS is completely harmless to many Northern European whites due to immunity gained from being descended from survivors of the Black Plague that swept Europe in the 14th century.[1]  AIDS is also only mildly harmful to the proportion of people that have partial inherited resistance to the virus acquired from relatives that survived the Black Plague.  These individuals can be considered “semi-immune”.[2] In this subsection of the population AIDS medication may do more harm that good.   Black and brown people tend to fare the worst when it comes to HIV / AIDS.  These individuals acquire the virus very easily, have little or no immunity to the virus, and die far quicker after being infected. 

When investigating the AIDS “crisis” one should ask the obvious questions: How did a race specific virus that behaves unlike any other virus known to man suddenly appear from out of nowhere?  Why does the AIDS virus kill with bigoted precision?  Why are the overwhelming majority of those killed by this virus those that the ruling elite find objectionable?  Why is the “straight” white power structure immune from this virus?  The answer to these questions is obvious yet deliberately suppressed by the mainstream media and AIDS charities seeking increased funding for treatment and cures.  If the AIDS charities acknowledged the truth about HIV / AIDS they would not be able to ask the US government for money because the government, in partnership with the elite, created the virus in the first place.  The US would then not be the savior that many claim it is.  The US government, in partnership with the parasitic elite, created the HIV / AIDS virus then claims to work on the cure.  This is a simple “Problem, Reaction, Solution”.[3] “Problem, Reaction, Solution” is an expression that was coined by researcher and author David Icke.  This expression briefly sums up a common ploy used by governments to take power from the people.  First governments create a problem and then attempt to solve the problem they created by taking power and resources from the people. The fraudulent “War on Terror” that was launched after the 911 Inside Job is another example of this ploy. 

Dr. Aurelio Peccei of the Club of Rome was one of those instrumental in the idea for original creation of HIV / AIDS.[4]  Numerous documents have shown that the elite had wanted population control for some time.  This population control would kill off undesirables that the elite parasites considered “useless eaters”.  This is why AIDS is so much more deadly for those without light white skin. Simply put, it is harder for those with white skin to get HIV and when they do it is often harmless.  The reason that HIV / AIDS directly attacks the immune system unlike any other virus is so that a vaccine could not be developed.  This plan was part of “global 2000”[5]. Just as modern taxpayers funded the “911 Inside Job”,[6] the American taxpayer funded the creation of HIV / AIDS.[7] The funding for HIV / AIDS was obtained from the US Congress under HB 15090 in 1969. The 10 million was ear marked for the creation of this bio-weapon.

 In testimony before a Senate committee it was revealed that they intended to produce a:


“Synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. Within the next 5 to 10 years it would probably be possible to make a new infective microorganism which would differ in certain important aspects from any known disease-causing organisms.  Host important of these is that it might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious diseases.”[8]


The elite also created this disease because they wanted an answer to overpopulation.  Elite scientist Sir Julian Huxley had this to say: “Overpopulation is, in my opinion, the most serious threat to the whole future of our species.”  The project to create HIV / AIDS was code named MK-NAOMI and was carried out, at least in part, in Fort Detrick, Maryland.  The virus was designed to specifically target the black and Hispanic populations[9], in short, those without the full or partial immunity to HIV / AIDS.

It was evil indeed for the white American tax payers to fund the creation of HIV / AIDS.  After all, it is primarily the blacks and brown people of the world that are adversely affected by it because whites are either immune from it or, when they do get it, are far less harmed by the virus. After reading this many will claim that the white gay community was devastated by HIV / AIDS in the 1980’s.  This is true but not for the reasons initially assumed.   

The reason the white gay community was the first affected by the disease was due to being directly injected with large amounts of the AIDS virus.  During the gay Hepatitis-B vaccine experiment in 1978[10] many gay men were used as carriers of the virus in an attempt to exterminate gays.  This extermination was assisted by the introduction of toxic AIDS drugs like AZT.   Many of these white gay men would have recovered from AIDS if it was not for toxic drugs.  White people get HIV by having very abrasive anal sex while black and brown people can acquire it very easily through regular sex. Sexual repression and the lack of safe sex information has caused AIDS to spread among the youth.

I am frequently quoted out of context so I wish to restate my beliefs regarding age of consent laws.  The numeric age of consent should be replaced with puberty as a GUIDE to an individual’s readiness for sex.  An arbitrary age of consent is silly and pointless. The puberty model would be evoked when the sex is consensual and happens to involve an individual under the age of puberty.  

If puberty becomes the guide to an individual’s readiness for sex then in instances where the state claims that “sexual immorality” occurred, the state would have to prove the existence of this “sin” by proving that the individual did not enter puberty at the time of the “sinful” act.  Under the puberty model for sexual readiness, the state could bring in scientists and doctors to attempt to prove that the individual did not go through puberty yet at the time the “sin” occurred.  The defense could use their own doctors if they claim that the individual went thorough puberty and the case could be delivered to the jury as is fair.  Under this new model young teens with a high sex drive would no longer be called “jail bate” but would have their right to sexual expression respected.

 Sex education should be taught at a very early age and safe activities that have been shown to be safe and prevent HIV / AIDS such as oral sex should be taught as early as possible.  The “godly” officials of the church and state that relish forcing their version of “morality” and “purity” on the people could be retrained as safe sex educators, or in cases of stubborn personalities, they could be retrained to clean the public toilets and rest stops. This way their “purity and morality” could be put to good use as they “purify” the toilets of “sinful” human waist.




[2] Jan Lamprecht, “Breakthrough On How Some Seem Immune To HIV”, (11-27-3),

[3] See:

[4] William Cooper, Behold a  Pale Horse

[5] William Cooper, Behold a  Pale Horse

[7] William Cooper, Behold a  Pale Horse

[8] William Cooper, Behold a  Pale Horse

[9] William Cooper, Behold a  Pale Horse

Interview with an Innocent Sexual Offender

May 22, 2008

By Christian Peper


The current bandwagon movement against “sexual predators” and especially against “child molesters” is not the first bandwagon movement to sweep America.  Throughout history various minorities have been identified and scapegoated. These poor souls were forced to go through life with the dreaded label of communist, Jew, homosexual, pothead, or, more recently, Islamic extremist.  It is irrelevant what label these minorities held, what matters is they were separated from society either physically or through social ostrazation. 


Governments wish to further cement their power and authority and bandwagon movements are a tool to this end.  Sexual offenders have become the new boogie man. 

The identification of the new “Boogieman” called the “sexual offender” increases the power of government because the people turn to the government to protect them from “sinful” new menaces and potential threats. The reader is encouraged to study other works written by Christian Peper such as: “The American Pedophile Witch Hunt” to become fully informed on this subject.  Few Americans realize just how easily they can loose their rights with a swipe of the pen.


I had the rare opportunity to interview one of these dreaded “sexual offenders”.  I must say that far from being the boogie man portrayed by the media; all my interactions with this “sexual offender” indicated that I was dealing with a caring, considerate, and ultimately harmless family man.


I, Christian Peper, can say with full confidence that Charles (Chuck) A. McGonagle

poses absolutely no risk to anyone and is far less “sexually deviant” than the average American. Despite Charles (Chuck) McGonagle not agreeing with all of my views, he was still willing to be interviewed by me.  After interacting with Charles (Chuck)  McGonagle I came to the realization I was not talking to a “sexual offender” or a “child molester” but simply an all-American, average, ordinary, traditional, patriotic, man that  “made out” with a young woman at a party that was technically under the age of consent but looked every bit a woman.  At the time of this “crime” Charles McGonagle was only 20-years-old himself. Apparently two youths engaging in the “sin” of premarital sexual contact is now a crime.  


Charles McGonagle was only 20 years old when he committed a “crime” that he had no want, wish, or desire to commit in the first place.  I suspect that after the absurd, comically sad ordeal Charles McGonagle has been through his sole sexual attraction is for women with gray in their hair.


I can confidently say to the parents of children in New Hampshire that they should look for neighbors as harmless as Charles (Chuck) McGonagle.  To call Charles (Chuck) McGonagle a “danger” to the children is silly indeed.  If there were more men like Charles McGonagle then the children would be in far less danger. 


On to the interview:


Christian Peper: Hello, Charles McGonagle. I would like to begin this interview by asking you to briefly summarize your experiences regarding the label you now carry of “sexual offender”.  How did you get this label?


Charles McGonagle:  I am a registered sex offender and this is my story. In 1985 I was only twenty. I was at a party and met a girl. We were all drinking and having a great time. I ended up in my car with this girl and we fooled around. We came close but did not have sex. It turns out she was underage. I did six months in jail for my “crime”. Ten years pass and during that time I got married, had two children, went back to school and got my degree. In 96 I get a letter telling me I am a sex offender and I must register until I am dead. This was not on public record. While registering at some police departments I was spit on by cops. I was shoved into a wall. I was forced to sit and be degraded. I was threatened by police as well.  Now twenty three years after my “crime” I am on the public web page labeled as a child molester.  All of my neighbors hate me and want me to move. My job and career that I have spent years building will be lost soon. This means I will lose my house.  My daughter is harassed at school by her peers. My life is in ruins and I am told that it will only get worse due to upcoming law changes in the next year.  As I understand it, the sex offender registration is supposed to protect people and not further punish the people on it.  I am constantly told by my states officials that I am not being further punished.  Oh, just for the record, I have never had a sex offence before of since that incident.  Am I a threat to society?  Are your children in danger of me?  There are many people out there in the same situation as I am.  Where have OUR rights gone? Are we to be considered the expendable casualties of unjust and confused laws?  I guess our lives are expendable in the name of protecting the people.


Christian Peper: Did you know the young woman was under age at the time?


Charles McGonagle: I did not know the young lady was underage. To tell you the truth I did not think about it at the time. She looked like the rest of us. 


Christian Peper: How old was the young lady?  Can you describe how old she looked?


Charles McGonagle: I was told by the police at the time she was fifteen.  This is a fight that I still have to this day. You see just two years ago a detective at my registration decided that the little box on my paper work was not correct. She decided it should be checked as aggravated felonious sexual assault. This was never the case and I told her that. She said that she had checked into it and that it really did not matter. I was getting nowhere with her so I left and was forced to prove her wrong.  Oh, by the way, I did prove her wrong, and there is a huge difference in the little checked boxes.  Anyway, I had to get the original paper-work from the court from more than twenty years ago to prove my case. The paper-work I got fixed my problem with her but created another.  At some point someone more than two decades ago put the age of the girl at thirteen.  So I must tell you that I am not sure how old she was at this point.  I don’t really think it matters as I was not looking for an underage girl at all.  How old did she look?  As I said before she looked like the rest of us at the time:  Tight Levis jeans, tight shirt, drinking a beer, and smoking a Marlboro.  If you are asking was she developed, well the answer is yes, very much so.  In fact I admit that was the first thing I noticed.  She was also about two inches shorter than me.  I am 5’ 8” tall.  She talked like the rest of us, drank like the rest of us and smoked pot like the rest of us.


Christian Peper: Did you consider asking for a government ID the same way bartenders ask for ID before serving alcoholic beverages?


Charles McGonagle:  An ID? You must remember that this was a long time ago.  It is way before all this sex crime stuff came about.  No, I never thought of asking for ID.  I was not selling her a drink.  She was at a private home (not mine), at a house party, and, as I said, she looked like the rest of us.  In fact, she looked older than some of the girls that were my age.


Christian Peper:  Do you think that you should have been charged with some kind of crime for not asking to see the young woman’s ID?  After all, bartenders are charged for accidentally selling alcohol to under aged individuals and convenience store clerks must ask for ID when a customer buys cigarettes.  You are clearly guilty of an accident; why shouldn’t you be charged for not asking to see the young woman’s ID before you engaged in what many consider a “sinful” act (unmarried sexual contact)?


Charles McGonagle:  I guess if there had been such a law at the time then I would have been charged with that as well.  As I said she looked like the rest of us and an ID never entered my mind.  Yes, I am guilty of an accident. I am also guilty of a crime as ignorance is no excuse for violating the law.  I understand that and I accept that.  I cooperated fully with the police and paid the price.  Just for the record, I was not the only male at that party eyeballing this girl.  She was very attractive and friendly.  I guess I was the lucky one, ha!  As far as it being a sinful act (unmarried sexual contact) I guess I will have to take my place in hell with the majority of the people who have ever walked this earth, including the lawmakers of our country.  I accept that as well.  I have made my peace with God if you will.


Christian Peper:  Do you currently have any interest in having sexual relations with individuals under the age of 18?


Charles McGonagle:  I must tell you honestly that I have never had any interest in having sex with children. That said, I am not going to tell you that I have never given a second look to an attractive women that may be in college of even high school for all I know. This does not mean I want to jump in bed with her.  It means I am human and find women attractive.  However, I also must tell you that with my situation I am very scared to look most times.  I have almost been made to feel dirty for finding women at just about any age attractive.  This whole situation has also played a major role in hurting my sex life for many years; more so since I was put on the public web not long ago. The “situation” is always in the back of the mind and it does make you feel dirty or something.  That often leads to poor or no performance.  You must remember that the state I live in is calling me a pervert, a pedophile, or what ever else you want to call me. This plays hard on the mind and soul of a person that is nothing like that at all. I have been put under the same umbrella as the truly sick individuals of the world and that really hurts and bothers me.


Christian Peper:  What do you think of the movement to raise the age of consent to 21? 


Charles McGonagle:  I think that to raise the age of consent to 21 would only serve the politicians and the police.  Raise the age and you will automatically raise the number of “criminals”.  This will raise the number of arrests made and expand the registration list.  Now it becomes easier for a politician to say “See, look what I have done to reduce  crime”. “Look what I have done to protect you and yours.”  Of course, many people will buy into this and give that politician another term and a raise.  I guess it’s easy to save a sinking ship and be a hero if you are the one that put holes in the boat to begin with.  I do not pretend to know what the proper age of consent should be. You (Christian Peper) suggested in the article you wrote titled: “The American Pedophile Witch Hunt” that perhaps the age of consent should be puberty.  Puberty, I don’t know really. I do recall being taught in history class many years ago that it was commonplace to have your daughter married off and bearing children by the age of fourteen or so. This does not mean that I am interested in young girls. This is just what I was taught. I guess you could ask why God made puberty so young. Why are women and men (boys and girls) able to have children so young?  Maybe our government is ready to call God a pedophile. I really don’t know the answer. I can only tell you that I truly have never had nor will I ever have the desire to have sex with children.


Christian Peper: Do you want the young woman you were involved with to register as a sexual offender the same way a 13 year old girl in Utah was charged as a sexual offender for having consensual sex with a 12 year old boy?  Is the solution to outlaw all premarital sex?


 Charles McGonagle:  No, I do not want the girl from the party to be forced to register as an offender. To tell you the truth I have not seen that girl since that night twenty-three years ago. I think the situation of the 13-year-old in Utah is totally wrong.  I personally know individuals in similar situations as mine.  I have seen many other situations that are also very wrong.  More wrongs can never make anything right.  I do know that for sure.  I guess the law makers of our country have not figured that out yet. They only know they need to look like they are protecting everyone.  If that means hurting the innocent and destroying families in the process then that seems to be ok.  Typical American politics if you ask me.


I guess outlawing premarital sex will fix things just fine for some religious groups. It will definitely make lawmakers shine in some people’s eyes.  It will, without a doubt, secure the government’s “big brother is watching you” programs.  What better way to keep an eye on your subjects than to get them all onto a registration that was created to house only the truly dangerous people of our society.  This will help to squash the will of the people to fight back.  I can tell you first hand that being on this list does make you scared.  It does make you think twice about fighting it.  I mean, what will they do to me and/or to my family next?  Of course I would imagine that if this happens then the law makers and the elite of the world would be excluded from the pool the regular people swim in.  I mean, you already see that every day with the corrupt government, with movie stars and such that seem to get a slap on the wrist when you and I would be all but crucified for the same actions.  If you or I had been arrested as many times a Robert Downey Junior for drugs we would be doing some serious time. Oh, by the way, congratulations to Robert on his new block buster movie.


Christian Peper: There is beginning to be a consensus among thinking people that sex crime registration does not protect children and may actually put them in more danger.  How do you feel about the modern day scarlet letter people like yourself are required to wear?


Charles McGonagle:   I want to say that I do not disagree with sexual predator registration; I just want it to be used for what it was intended.  I know that there are many bad people in this world.  I have children myself.  They are older now but of course I want them protected from the bad people of the world.  I just want someone to explain to me how the young girl from Utah is a danger to anyone?  How am I a danger to anyone?  How are two people at any age engaging in consensual sex a danger to anyone?  Unless you are talking religion, then it is a matter of personal belief and that is just what it is.  I want our lawmakers to get it right. They don’t seem to understand or care that they have this all wrong.  I have been told by some reps in my state that they know the system is in need of repair and they are working on it.  Well, we all know that the government does not move to fast.  They need to realize that there are thousands of lives being trashed. They need to realize that many people are being hurt in every way you can hurt a person including psychologically.  Some day someone is going to snap and who will we blame? There needs to be serious law reform NOW not a little this year, a step back the following, then a little more progress in a few more years.  This is not good enough and the people of this country deserve better than that.  I am not just saying this for me.  I am fighting for others in my shoes.  I don’t understand why there can’t be a case-by-case review of the offender list.  I have been told it cost too much money.  I have not done the research on it but I would bet my life that it’s cheaper to do a case-by-case review than it is to keep track of all the people on the list that should not be there.  I would bet my kids lives that it is cheaper than the war going on.


Christian Peper:  Tell me about what you have done in terms of talking with state officials or other politicians.  Have they been responsive or do you get the feeling that they only care about getting reelected?  What types of interaction have you had with state officials? What have state officials said to you?


Charles McGonagle:  I first started out by sending a letter to our governor.  I got no response, so I sent another letter stating that I will send three or more letters per day until I get a reply.  I did get a letter back from some low level person in the governor’s office. They informed me that I needed to contact my local representatives to have the laws changed.  However; “The governor cares very much and thanks you for contacting his office.” That’s all I could get from them.  I did contact all the local and some not-so local state representatives.  I did this more than once.  I got only one reply from a representative.  It was a generic reply saying nothing more than thanks for contacting me. Then one day I was simply looking at new news on the net about sex offender laws in other states.  I put my story on a web page and that is how I met you, Christian Peper. Although we do not agree on every single thing, Christian, I thank you for your understanding and work you have put into this.  It means more than you know.  I also met a person named Laurie Pederson.  She is a real fighter for people in my shoes.  Her husband is also on the registration list and should not be. She is always at the state house fighting with senators and such for change.  She also goes from town to town meetings on this subject and speaks for us.  


Just a few weeks ago there was a hearing on purposed law changes for 09. They wanted to put the work addresses of those on the sex offender registration on the web. There are other changes as well they were thinking of.  I was invited to speak at this hearing in front of five senators.  I was very nervous but had to do it.  It was the first time ever that I was able to tell my story, my concerns, and my anger to high level state officials.  I must say they all looked very bored and you could tell they did not want to be there. By the time I was called up they even said it has been a long day and we are tired so make is brief.  One of the first things I said to them is that I understand you are all tired of hearing this.  I said “I know you are all tired of dealing with this matter and want to move on”. “Senator’s, I promise you that I am much more tired of dealing with this than you are.” Then I went into my story.  I talked of how I was forced to tell my teenage daughter about this matter because the state put me on the internet.  I talked of how I am not the street pervert the state makes me out to be. I talked about how my job is now in serious jeopardy. Then I thanked them for in advance for not passing more laws to further punish me.


By law a person that has committed a crime and did their time should not be subject to any further punishment under the law; yet with the swipe of a pen the rights of people in my situation are changed every year. They simply say that no matter what they decide it is not further punishment. They even force inmates in prison that have served their time and are due for release to stay in prison after their sentence is up!  This is really happening NOW!  I tell people all the time that if things can be changed that easily when it comes to sex offenders then what is next for the rest of America. 


Anyway, I had every senator’s mouth open.  They did not know what to say to me.  I asked each one of those Senators, after hearing my story, please tell me how I am a threat to anyone.  Not one of them would answer.  After my testimony I was surrounded by people shaking my hand thanking me.  There was one woman that came to me with tears in her eyes.  She was saying how sorry she was.  She asked me what can be done.  I found out later that she was there as an activist to fight for tougher offender laws, and she was saying sorry to me!  That made me feel really good.  So, I guess I did well there.  I found out about two weeks after that they removed the law about putting work addresses on the net.  My boss had already told me he would have to fire me if they did that.  So it is a fairly large victory for me/us.  I don’t know were the rest of the law changes are now.  I do know that I will be forced to give a DNA sample and other things like that.  I, and others in my situation, are for the most part being put on parole now.  I don’t remember twenty three years ago the judge ever saying that in twenty three years you must follow parole guidelines.  But “I am not being punished” so I guess it’s ok for the lawmakers.  I don’t know if the officials are worried about being reelected or not.  I would imagine that helping to deregulate sex laws is most likely political suicide.


Christian Peper: There are many who would say that you got exactly what you deserve because you engaged in the “sin” of premarital kissing or premarital sexual contact.  Do you feel that you committed a sin, and, if so, why should the young woman you sinned with also not be exposed as a sinful “sexual offender”?


Charles McGonagle: As I said before I guess that if this whole thing is looked at from a religious point of view then yes, I did sin.  So therefore the girl in question also did.  I do not think for a minute that this girl left her home that evening looking to get some older guy in trouble; just as I did not leave my home looking for a young girl.  I was not looking for a girl at all, in fact, it just happened.  I don’t think she tricked me per say.  I think she was playing an age she was not so that she could drink some beer and hang with the cool crowd.  Anyone else out there guilty of that in there life?  If this is truly a sin then I would imagine that Hell is very full and Heaven has wide open spaces.


Christian Peper: To many Americans the fact that you engaged in premarital sexual contact is enough to call you a sinner and immoral.  Do you accept the label of sinner for engaging in premarital sexual contact?


Charles McGonagle: If I am a sinner in the eyes of God than what of it?  I have tried to make up for what happened.  I did my time and have never offended again. That is because I am not a sexual deviant.  So if I am a sinner then yes, I will take my place with others such as the Gov. of CA, President Clinton, President Bush, and JFK. Any politician that has ever cheated on his wife. Any priest that has hurt instead of healed. The list goes on as we all know. All I can say to those who want to label me as a sinner is GET OVER IT! And stop judging your neighbor.


Christian Peper: Why are politicians so eager to appear “tuff on crime” that they are actually hurting the youth that they pretend to protect? Is the drive to get elected so important that politicians would sacrifice the children on the altar of special interests and the radical right wing Christian agenda?


Charles McGonagle:  First I must say that I do think that America does have the best system in the world. That said I do think that it is seriously broken.  It has been for many years and is getting worse.  Politicians take the easiest thing they can do to save face. “See, I may not have done this or that but look at this”, “aren’t I doing a great job?”.  I think there are some good politicians out there.  However, it seems that most do not listen to the people.  They do listen to whoever will bolster their position and/or change laws to suit their needs as they see fit.  That makes it very easy for them to do things with crime. I also think they do very little else that really has any real impact on anything.  It’s almost like a little child that has chores to do.  They may not want to do them so they do something else.  As far as the future, they will either not be in office or they will be dead so the politicians don’t care.     


Christina Peper: You mentioned earlier your treatment at the hands of police. Can you elaborate on your treatment at the hands of law enforcement?  Can you describe some other ways you have been mistreated due to the label you now carry?


Charles McGonagle: Over the years I have had situations at police stations when I go to register.  I was taken into an interrogation room and called a pervert and the sickest scum on the face of the earth.  I was then shoved into a cement wall by the same person.  Then he egged me on to push him back.  He wanted me to touch him so he could kill me he said.  At another police station I was shoved into a chair and then surrounded by three detectives.  I was called all kinds of names again.  Then one of them spit on me.  Again, if I had said or done anything I would have found myself in a cell with a few bruises I am sure.  I have had my registration paper work changed on me for no reason other than to make my offence look worse than it was.  I did fight that and had it changed back.  I did put in a complaint but nothing ever came of it.


A few years back I went on a family cruise out of Florida. There was about twenty of us. Coming into US customs my family’s luggage had been put aside. We did not know why.  I was then picked out of my family by two customs officers.  I was shoved by one and asked over and over were are my drugs.  “How many little girls was I with while out of the country?”  I told them that I refused to deal with them.  Then they said thats fine we will go ask your kids if they noticed you with any little girls and were your dad hides his drugs.  This is one time that if I had been alone I would have ended up in jail.  I was that mad.  I contacted the head of customs when I got home.  I blew a gasket with him.  He did say he was sorry but that’s the extent of it.  There were other situations as well but they boil down to the same types of things.  I must say that the worst thing I have to deal with is the every day knowledge that I am on this registration.  That I am on the public internet for all to see, pegged as a child molester.  This is the worst of it.  All the detectives that have harassed me in the past and the ones who will do it in the future only show how immature they really are.  Yet they are given badges and guns to protect us.  Scary!


Christina Peper: The way you have been treated due to blatant governmental abuse of power is a clear violation of your civil rights.  Have you considered filing suit against the United States government for violating your civil rights?  Have you investigated this possibility with a qualified attorney yet?  Will you keep this option open in the future?


Charles McGonagle:   I did contact two different lawyers on the subject and the ACLU. One lawyer I contacted was the same person that worked my case twenty three years ago. He said the way they have changed the laws there is nothing that can be done at this point. The law makers, you see, have covered their bases.  As I said, if they see an obstacle, be it a law or a constitutional right, they simply change it.  It is that easy for them. That is why I say it all the time, be careful people what is next.  I mean until just over a year ago, I had the right to go to court and have this removed from my record.  This process cost thousands in fees and lawyer bills.  Over the years of having two young children I could never afford it.  As it was not on public record I put it on the back burner so someday I could save the money and have this done. Then, when they changed the law and put me on the public web they also took away my right to go to court and have this removed.  I now have no rights what so ever.  Also, I now must register twice a year instead of once.  Also, I must pay a fee for the privilege of registration.  It is supposed to increase from seventeen per registration to fifty next year. You know darn well that this will go up every year.  The other lawyer I spoke to also said the same thing.  Laws have to be changed before anything can be done. The ACLU declined my case as they do not see winning it.  I have been told there is a chance that with the new law changes for 2009 I may be able to spend several thousand and get myself off the public web page.  This is still up in the air.  I will of course do so, however, the damage is done.  Then it also raises the question that if I am not seen as threat enough to be on the public web then why am I a threat enough to be on the registration at all?  I must tell you that when I was first was forced onto the registration I contacted the state and asked how can this be happening after ten years time.  I asked them how far back they went into the past to form this list of offenders.  I was told they went back as far as ten years.  It turns out that because I had also received three years probation with my six month jail sentence, that my probation period went over the date that they went back to.  So, because I still had some probation time left is the only reason I am dealing with this twenty three years later. What makes it even worse is my probation actually ended early as I was not seen as a threat. Yet when they formed the registration they refused to look at that and went with the original ending date. Chew on that for awhile.


Christian Peper: This is the Last question I will ask you, Mr. McGonagle.  You have certainly been through a lot.  It seems that people are hateful and cruel. Has your experience lead you to feel hateful towards humanity?


Charles McGonagle:  I do not hate humanity.  I am scared for it.  Not just with these situations but with everything going on. Our politicians lie to us so much they end up believing their own lies.  Our president is so out of touch with everything it is scary.  Big business, the drug and food companies, and the lobbyist seem to run the country, and most people don’t seem to care.  The rich get richer, the middle class is almost extinct, and the poor take it on the chin. Yet nothing seems to get done.  I am angry with the politicians and law makers for abusing power and not doing the peoples will.  I am angry at the people because they don’t seem to care; or we have been brain washed into thinking we can’t do anything so it is every person for themselves. 


I want people to know that I am not being a baby about this.  I did my crime even if I did not intend on committing it. I did my time and just want to be left alone to live my life.  I am tired of dealing with this, yet I have no choice.  I refuse to be pushed around by the government and/or big business.  I have had to be very careful of how I handle this situation as anything I do can lead to more persecution for me and my family.  At the same time, being a fighter, I have no choice but to put myself out there.  I mean the state I live in has already done that for me, so I may as well step up on the soap box if you will. At least then people will know the truth of the matter.  I mean there must be some end to all this other than what the state mandates.  MY DEATH! Christian, if I am ever fortunate enough to have this end for me I swear I will still fight for others that are being hurt.  I know it is a fine line as there are bad people out there.  However, that does not mean that we can live with the “shoot them all and sort out the bodies later” laws we now have.  I will continue to fight with the help of people such as yourself, Christian and Laurie Peterson.  Just like the Jews or gays it will be a long road but I believe we shall win. Thank you Christian for giving me the chance to tell my story.  Thank you for helping to show people that this situation has much more to do with than just sex crimes.  It truly has to do with every persons constitutional rights.  I just hope people still care enough to fight for what is theirs.  If anyone wishes to contact me please do so at: I want to hear the good and the bad.  Thanks again.


Christian Peper: Is it ok if I call you a hero Mr. Charles McGonagle?  Never mind the question; the answer is clear.  I will call you a hero and the people of New Hampshire should too. You are not only a hero for your steadfast courage in the mist of oppression but you are also a hero for what you have done to promote personal freedom by demanding that the arrogant politicians reform unjust and oppressive laws that scapegoat the innocent such as yourself.  Two youths (such as you both were at the time) should never be arrested for engaging in consensual kissing or even sex.


What is the next step for Charles (Chuck) McGonagle, should he report to the nearest government official to have his genitals removed for the “sin” of being a normal American male?


Heroes like Charles McGonagle should be honored and celebrated rather that marginalized by the people of New Hampshire.  Shame on those in the “Free State Movement” who do not recognize the effect absurd “sex crime” laws have on individual freedom.  Shame on those in the freedom movement and “Uncle Tom” Libertarians that ignore the campaign to gradually outlaw premarital sex.


You, Charles McGonagle, are a true hero of the freedom movement.  God bless you and your family


Charles McGonagle is no more of a “pedophile” than those Americans that eat food favored by children (like pizza) and watch cartoons or childish movies.  Perhaps, with time, all Americans will register as some form of sexual offender.  This was proposed quite recently.  The anti-sex movement wanted to test all Americans for signs of sexual desire for children using a modified form of the “Abel Assessment”[1] combined with electronic testing of ones private organs.  Those immoral Americans that refuse to take the test would be assigned a risk status indicating that they posed some danger to children.  After all, only someone with something to hide would resist the Orwellian police state of America.


Many Americans do indeed enjoy food favored by children like pizza and ice cream.  This could be used as evidence of pedophilia the same way visions and dreams were used as evidence of witchcraft in the 17th century.


The “war on drugs”, the “war on terrorism” and now the “war on sexual immorality” gives purpose to Americans that need to be a part of bandwagon movements to inject meaning and order into their relatively unimportant lives. Now, more than ever, we must push at power in this country.[2]


After all, “protecting the children” from the sinfulness of their genitals is well worth living in a police state for most uninformed, ignorant Americans that enjoy jumping on one bandwagon after the next.  Don’t the “children” deserve a better future?  Lets “save the children” from the police state, regardless of what the new definition of “child” becomes. 





[2] NYC SEX How New York City Transformed Sex in America, Museum of Sex

The American Pedophile Witch Hunt

May 19, 2008

By Christian Peper.


From the mid 15th to the early 18th century black smoke filled the skies of Europe as “Godly” men presided over the executions of attractive young women who were accused of witchcraft.[1]  The lust in the eyes of the “authorities” of the time was not limited to just the lust for political power.  When sexuality is inhibited people turn tribally to their rulers to provide their sexual stimulation in the form of torture, war, and other violence.[2] 


The bandwagon movement to eliminate witches was not limited to Europe.  Americans in the 17th and 18th century were also determined to maintain a rigid social order using accusations of witchcraft to maintain patriarchal control.[3] Early America was not immune to the cleansing fire delivered by these early politicians with the power of the cross and the official sanction of the mob who had “elected” them to purify and protect the people (and especially the children) from the scourge of witchcraft.


Whispers of “witchcraft” were enough to send young women off to be burned alive for the glory of petty tyrants.  These pubic executions titillated sexually repressed early colonial Americans.  Regardless of the pleasure derived from the public executions of attractive young women in a sexualized manner, the local town’s people felt they were performing a valuable service to the public.  One had a duty, after all, to protect the children of the town from these witches that were certain to corrupt the delicate children’s sensibilities.  If this mission from God lead to the side effect of entertaining a lustful yet sexually repressed public, then that was just an added bonus for doing the work of Jesus. 


Modern Americans would assume that witch hunts are a relic of the past.  This assumption is silly indeed for anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of history. Throughout history various minorities have been identified and scapegoated. These poor souls were forced to go through life with the dreaded label of communist, Jew, homosexual or, more recently, pothead, or Islamic extremist.  It is irrelevant what label these minorities held, what matters is they were separated from society either physically or through social ostrazation. 


Although bandwagon movements tend to focus on the poor and disenfranchised, one’s social standing and position does not necessarily protect one against bandwagon movements.  The “father” of the anti-communist “red scare”, Sen. Joseph McCarthy himself, whose right wing movement is derided in thinking circles as “McCarthyism” was not immune from the bandwagon movement to purge “dirty”, “sinful”, “immoral” homosexuals.  This bandwagon movement ran concurrently with “McCarthyism” and is known as the “Lavender Menace”.[4] 


The current Bandwagon movement against “sexual predators” and especially against “child molesters” is not the first anti-genital movement to sweep America.  In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s  there was an exaggerated danger of white girls being kidnapped and sold as sex slaves to immoral men who would corrupt them.[5] In the 1990’s there was a sex crime scare when “repressed memories” (largely implanted by well-meaning psychiatrists and psychologists) received wide spread media attention.


Perhaps the most foolishly amusing of the anti-sex bandwagon movements to sweep America took place in the 1980’s.  President Ronald Reagan was in office and the nation had become sharply divided between those in the Christian evangelical movement and those outside the faith and thus “immoral”, or, at the very least, those with questionable “family values”.  Into this rift came a witch-hunt that in many ways paralleled the witch-hunt that took place in the 17th century.  The “Good Christian Americans” had worked themselves up into a frenzy of righteous indignation about a series of reports that satanic ritual abuse was being visited upon the children.  These “satanic cults” were allegedly engaging in rituals that involved children and were promoting sin in the form of sexual license and immorality.[6]


The silliest part of the “satanic ritual abuse” scare was the satanic cults as described in the media did not exist.  While it is certainly true that throughout history there have been people that gather in small groups and become involved in unconventional hobbies like knitting, basket weaving, rowing, wrestling, and even Satanism; the actual organized and sizeable satanic cults described before congress and to members of “law enforcement” simply did not exist.  During the satanic ritual abuse scare teenagers with too much time on their hands that spray painted “satanic” symbols that they found in books that they did not understand were rounded-up and held out as examples of “satanic” cults.  Ironically, politicians, lawmakers, and the ruling elite themselves have historically been the primary dabblers in satanic activity due to their having both the time and resources to indulge in such nonsense while the remainder of the population has job worries to contend with.[7]  Just as the fraudulent “War On Terror” finds losers with too much time on their hands and calls them “terrorists”, the public in the 1980’s was only to eager to believe self appointed “experts” and law enforcement personnel desiring increased police state funding.


As previously stated in the introduction; asexuality and sexual repression parallels fascism because when sexuality is inhibited people turn tribally to their rulers to provide their sexual stimulation in the form of torture, war, and other violence.[8] This is why governments have a vested interest in sexual repression.  Governments wish to further cement their power and authority and sexual repression is a tool to this end.  The identification of the new “Boogieman” called the “sexual offender” increases the power of government because the people turn to the government to protect them from this “sinful” new menace.


The control of individuals’ sexuality is a key element in fascist organizations and countries.[9]  Sexual repression is a necessary component for the control of a population.[10]  “Make love not war” was far more than just a catchy 1960’s jingle; it was a radical political statement.  It has been proven time and again throughout history that sexual repression equals fascism.[11]


Just as the sexually repressed early colonial Americans used the accusation of “witchcraft” to ensure loyalty to the religious and political rulers of the day, modern American politicians and governmental officials use the sex offender witch-hunt to keep a largely ignorant and emotional American population in a state of fear for their children’s safety and morality.


Few Americans remember that there was a time in our history when the role of a father was to take a young son, often between the ages of 15 or 16, to a whore house.  Traditions such as this have been air-brushed out of the American experience.  Now the modern-day role of a father is to encourage his son to repress his sexuality and promote the lust for war and military torture in order to replace his natural sexuality.  I humbly suggest that the new approach to human sexuality is far more costly in terms of lost lives and treasure for expensive wars.


What about the human cost?  What have these laws done to the “class” of people known to many in the freedom movement as “innocent sexual offenders”? “Innocent sexual offenders” are innocent men whose only “crime” is to have engaged in politically incorrect sex that any healthy red-blooded American male would have participated in just a few decades before. “Participated in” is key here because no one is arguing to legalize un-consensual sexual acts.   Fully consensual sexual acts with individuals who have achieved the age of puberty have never been historically illegal until very recently in America. 


Since the founding of America, Americans have realized that the natural age of consent was puberty.  The entire bedrock of western jury prudence is built upon the concept of a universally accepted law of self determination.[12] When this right to self determination is eroded by requiring individuals to wait until they are 18 or 21 to engage in sexual relations or even kissing (as the students that were kicked out of school for kissing can attest); then ones basic right to self determination is seriously eroded.  All thinking people that value individual rights must oppose the drive to raise the age of sexual consent to 21. One must ask oneself: why a young person can fight and die for ones country at 18 when they can’t enjoy a beer until the age of 21.  One must also ask ones self why the government has determined that no one is old enough to use certain politically incorrect drugs.


Few Americans realize just how easily they can loose their rights with a swipe of the pen.  Politicians, judges, and arrogant members of law enforcement who have made themselves guardians of morality and purity lord over an ill-informed public full of self-righteous idiocy.  The ignoble American voter is eager to gleefully jump on the latest bandwagon to “save the children” from the sinfulness of their own genitals regardless of the human cost. 


Under the banner of “saving the children” the word “child” itself has morphed into a strange new state of being that has taken on a life of its own.  The classic definition of a child has been replaced by a strange new definition deviating from historical precedent.  A “child” can be an individual 15, 16, 18, 21 or even older in the case of college students that are still dependent on their parents.  A “child” is either helpless and in need of adult guidance and control or a threat to society and in need of a long prison sentence or even execution.  It has been said that the easiest way for a “child” to become an adult is to commit a serious crime.  Then suddenly this “child” is an adult in many states and is often sexually assaulted or raped in prison with a wink and a nod from the “Godly” American system. 


Those who live in the great state of Maine have attempted to purify the state by making it a crime to look at children.  As absurd as this sounds, the people of Maine are determined to enforce their brand of morality by enforcing the law against “visual sexual aggression against children”.  The following two paragraphs are quoted from the website known as “Dvorak Uncensored”:[13]


“Those who peer at children in public could find themselves on the wrong side of the law in Maine soon. A bill that passed the House last month aims to strengthen the crime of visual sexual aggression against children, according to state Rep. Dawn Hill, D-York. Her involvement started when Ogunquit Police Lt. David Alexander was called to a local beach…Because the state statute prevents arrests for visual sexual aggression of a child in a public place, Alexander said he and his fellow officer could only ask the man to move along. “There was no violation of law that we could enforce. There was nothing we could charge him with,” Alexander said.”

“He attended a talk with Hill a week later and brought the case to her attention. Hill pledged to do what she could, Alexander said, and the result was a change through the Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee in the House, which made the law applicable in both private and public places. Alexander said he’s grateful Hill was willing to take up the cause, and is hopeful the measure will clear the Senate. “I’ll be pleased that we were able to identify this flaw and take steps to rectify it,” he said. Under the bill, if someone is arrested for viewing children in a public place, it would be a Class D felony if the child is between 12 to 14 years old and a Class C felony if the child is under 12, according to Alexander…..He noted that York police respond fairly regularly to reports of public peepers on the town’s beaches.”

As stated earlier, the previous two paragraphs were quoted from the website known as “Dvorak Uncensored”.


As if arresting people for the thought crime of looking at a youth while thinking impure thoughts is not enough; one has to wonder if the new definition of “child” will eventually begin to include attractive 20-year-old college “girls” roller skating in the park.  Imagine the number of “sinful” “child molesters” show up at beaches to oggle attractive 20-year-old college “children”.  Again, the definition of child changes from year to year and sometimes month to month.


According to our government’s own statistics the number of sex offenders that re-offend is extremely low.   Independent researchers have destroyed the myth of the re-offending sexual predator.  Sexual offenders are actually far less likely to re-offend than most other “criminals”.  Perhaps the reason many of these so-called “criminals” are so unlikely to reoffend is many are not “criminals” at all but merely individuals engaging in politically incorrect, yet consensual sex. 


Only about 14 percent of convicted sex offenders commit new sex crimes over a five-year period and about 20 percent did so over a 10-year period, according to Canadian researcher Karl Hanson’s widely cited review of studies involving more than 4,700 offenders.[14] Even this number of reoffenders is highly inflated because it includes relatively harmless offences like public urination and soliciting a prostitute as “sex crimes”.  Many estimate the number of sex offenders that re-offend by committing serious sex crimes rather than engaging in politically incorrect sex (like dating someone a year or two under the officially sanctioned age of consent) at less than 5%.  Regardless of the exact number of re-offending sexual offenders, communities are safer with sex offenders than with other more serious violent criminals.  Communities should welcome sex offenders to reduce violence and crime rather than shun them.


The same supernatural features assigned to witches are given to sex offenders such as they “can’t change” or “once a witch (pedophile), always a witch (pedophile)”.  Just as the local towns’ people were obsessed with witches using Amulets and Talismans, the FBI issued an “intelligence bulletin” in January 2007 on “symbols and logos used by pedophiles to identify sexual preferences.”[15]  As absurd as it sounds, the FBI alleges in the document that such things as triangles, hearts, and butterfly jewelry are part of a secret code that pedophiles use. The worst part of the “intelligence bulletin” is it cites the notoriously unreliable “Wikipedia” as a source.  While I, Christian Peper, have cited “Wikipedia” on occasion, it is only after confirming the information with other sources. There are no other reliable sources that confirm that pedophiles use “secret symbols” and talismans to communicate or to increase their power.  All of the symbols and jewelry described in the “intelligence bulletin” are popular in mainstream culture.  It is disturbing indeed that the purpose of this FBI “intelligence bulletin” is to provide valuable information to law enforcement personnel including local police.   A butterfly tattoo or the popular triangle that symbolizes many things including the Christian trinity may result in suspicion and questions about ones morality and danger to the community.


The reason the government makes “pedophiles” register is so politicians (many of whom are themselves secret sexual offenders) can appear to be tough on crime.  Examples of politicians that fit the popular definition of “sexual offenders” are:  Merrill Barter, Idaho Sen. Larry Craig, Louis Beres, Brian J. Doyle, Deputy Press Secretary for U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kevin Coan, Florida Rep. Mark Foley, New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer, and the list goes on and on.


By shifting the blame to others politicians hope their own “sexual sins” will not be discovered by their hypocritical constituency.  I, Christian Peper, have been stalked, slandered, and called a “child molester” and “pedophile” for suggesting that safe sex should be taught in school and the age of consent should be lowered to puberty.  Whether or not the reader agrees with me, I should not by slandered and have a hard time keeping a job because I voice a political opinion regarding the age of consent or safe sex education.  The end goal of the anti-sex movement is to outlaw all premarital sex and regulate married sex.  As stated earlier, the American people do not realize how easy it is to loose their rights due to a swipe of a pen.


Although Governmental greed and lust for power does much to explain the reason for the current sex crimes witch-hunt; another culprit with disputed origins[16] is involved in the disastrous miscarriage of justice known as the “sex crimes witch-hunt”.  At least part[17] of the modern sex crime witch-hunt is due to the existence AIDS virus.  A rather obscure virus that some claim came from the rainforests[18] has caused many Americans to view sex in an unhealthy manner.  The AIDS virus has caused widespread sexual repression.


Contrary to popular belief, it is virtually impossible for a “child” to get HIV / AIDS from a typical child sexual predator.  Very few of these “sexual predators” engage in high risk activities with their “victims”.  The typical “assault” is little more that the fondling of genitalia or oral sex.  Oral sex is so safe that many safe sex educators actively encourage oral sex to reduce or even eliminate the threat of HIV / AIDS. There has never been a single case of HIV / AIDS being transmitted by receiving oral sex.  The one who performs oral sex with their mouth is exposed to little or no risk also.  According to virtually all safe sex researchers there is a very low risk or only a theoretical risk for the one performing oral sex with ones mouth.[19]  Although there is some disagreement among researchers, many studies have shown that oral sex is a risk less proposition in terms of HIV / AIDS.[20]


Because very few Americans are able to still think abstractly, it is impossible for most to imagine what the age of consent would be if diseases like AIDS did not exist. Fortunately, there is a record of the age of consent laws.  In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s  the age of consent for much of America was set at puberty but rarely enforced if violated except when the parents were very wealthy and connected to “law enforcement” and opposed the courtship.  Would there still be an effort to raise the age of consent to 21 if sex was no longer deadly?  Is it right to punish those that not only had no hand in the creation of the disease but aren’t even infected? 


To the hard core anti-sex vigilantes a diagnosis of HIV is “just punishment” for a young man or woman who dares to engage in “sinful” acts before marriage. I, Christian Peper, have been slandered and denigrated by cheap internet vigilantes for daring to state that safe sex should be taught as soon as possible to the youth.  “Busting down” and handing out the largely meaningless label of “sexual offender” is viewed with relish for those that gleefully support any and all laws that restrict premarital and sometimes even marital sex.  Before the existence of AIDS most states’ age of consent laws were far lower.  Those age of consent laws were themselves frequently not enforced except as a way to oppress gays and lesbians. 


The modern American gay movement, having sold out completely to corporate interests,[21] is unconcerned about fellow gays being locked away after being identified as “sexual offenders” because the new corporate gay image is far more important than a few “casualties” and wrecked lives due to the sex crime witch-hunt.  Even today the age of consent laws are enforced in a highly discriminatory manner.  Men that have sex with 17 or even 20-year-old “boys” are seen as “child molesters” but when a female teacher has sex with a 14-year-old male the “child” is seen as a stud and the female teacher is seen as “hot woman” assuming she is attractive.


Unreasonably high age of consent laws are used to marginalize already marginalized minorities like gays and lesbians.  Men that have sex with 14-year-old boys are seen as child molesters but when an attractive female teacher has sex with a 14-year-old the teacher is seen as “too pretty to go to jail”. 


Debra Lafave, the US teacher who got no jail time for sleeping with her 14-year-old pupil was honored in the media as a “hot teacher”.  Radio talkshow hosts made jokes about how they “would have paid attention in class more” if she was their teacher and how they “wish their teacher looked like that”.  Imagine if the teacher was a male who had sex with a 14-year-old girl or, even worse, a male teacher that had sex with a 14-year-old boy.  The media treatment of these “sex offenders” is far, far worse than any other “sex offender”.


In the great state of Missouri a bill has been proposed that will allow the execution of those that “rape a child”.  This bill was proposed in responce to the Michael John Devlin sex crime reports.  What the media failed to report is that this new bill will be used almost exclusevely on gay men that have consentual sex with teenagers.  Much like the Nazis had a “final solution” to exerminate the Jews, executing “pedofiles” is the final solution the radical right seeks in order to clense the land of gays who have slightly younger lovers.  Is exterminating gay men with slightly younger lovers really the best way to maintain the morality and purity of the youth?  Will the state of Missouri build ovens to murder these new Jews when death row gets too crowded?  Only time will tell.


For historical perspective, in a Boston suburb in the late 1970’s District Attorney Garrett Byrne was defeated due to his desire to prosecute a group of gay men that had been arrested for repeated ongoing sex with many young teenage “boys”.  The men were acccused of using drugs and video games to lure the “boys” into a house.[22]  The “boys” where also photographed as they had sex.  This ongoing activity was called by papers a “sex ring”. The new DA said that no man should fear prison for having consentual sex with a teenager.[23]  Contrast the permissive late 1970’s with prison obsessed 2008.  Those who rule with an iron fist are proud America is the world’s top jailer. 


The folowing statistics from an article entitled: “Land of the free is world’s top jailer”[24] should send a chill down the spine of those Americans who can still think for themselves: The United States has less than 5 percent of the world’s population and almost a quarter of the world’s prisoners.[25] Approximately one out of every 100 Americans is in jail or prison.  Approximately one out of every 34 people are either incarcerated or on probation.  This puts the US ahead of China, Russia, Brazil, India, and Mexico.  One in 36 Hispanics is behind bars, One in 15 African Americans is in jail or prison, one in 355 white women between ages 35 and 39 are incarcerated.  America is deep in fascism.  If prison, jail, probation, sex offender registries and terrorist “Watch Lists” are taken into account, the number of Americans “in the system” could be up to 15% of the population.


Many of the anti-pedophile websites are actually anti-gay, pro right wing websites that seek to redefine what a “child” is.  These websites essentially condemn all gays and hold out as “proof” that gays are child molesters the “fact” that youthfulness is prized in the gay community.  It is unacceptable to the anti-sex movement that many older gays have lovers under the age of 21.  Even those older gays that have lovers that are over the age of 21 but appear youthful are held out as sexually immoral and potential pedophiles.


The Riverfront Times[26] April 17, 2008 edition ran a letter in the “Savage Love” dating advice column in which the host of the column, Dan Savage, commented on how he was made to feel self conscious because the 24 year old he was dating looked too young to be his lover according to his mother.  He felt that he needed to defend himself for having a youthful appearing lover.  Dan Savage joked about being afraid of being labeled a member of NAMBLA because he had a youthful appearing lover.   He went on to say this jokingly in the column: “You got me, Mom. He’s 12 years old. I’m the president of NAMBLA. I met him at Baskin-Robbins. I’m going to jail for this.”  Psychologists know that often in jokes the inner workings of the mind are found.  Are people now fearful of acquiring the dreaded label of “pedophile” for dating 24 year olds?


Examine this quote from a homosexual named Joel Hazlett who has been harassed and ostracized for the “sin” of having a boyfriend that is only 21 years old.  Ask yourself: Should the age of consent be even higher than 21 (perhaps 25 years old?) to ensure the morality and purity of the public?  Here are Joel Hazlett’s own words: 


I have been attacked by strangers for dating 21yo male, and that was a hate crime with no basis. The 21yo male was quite happy with me and I him, but the attack ensued because I was older and gay. This makes many cities “unsafe”…..Safety for me, means safety from bigots …… who make improper assumptions, then act as judge, jury and executioner.”


Does dating a 21 year old really make Joel Hazlett impure?  Is 21 now too young for sexual relations? Should the age of consent really be higher than 21?  Perhaps the people in “Godly” America do not care that their image in the rest of the world has become so solied.  Americans are viewed as hypocritical, puritanical, prison obsessed facists that need Viagra to preform due to the repression that is heaped upon them as they come of age in war obsessed churches. 


Age of consent laws are used to maintain the heterosexual, patriarchal system.  The gay movement has sold out completely to big money interests and is now no more than a mouth peace for the large corporations that, quite literally, own the American people and swim in the money generated from the prison industrial complex.  It is ironic indeed that while many Americans struggle to find jobs, the prison industry produces many goods ranging from silk-screened clothing to fine-ground optics.[27] Since the “Good Christian Americans” are loosing their jobs at a record rate because they continue to support any and all wars; perhaps they need to be arrested and “busted down” so that they can find meaningful work in the prison industrial complex.


For the “crime” of suggesting that safe sex should be taught in school and the age of sexual consent should be puberty to increase the safety and lawfulness of sex, internet vigilantes have been engaged in an organized campaign to slander my name.  It is sad indeed that one can be labeled a “child molester” or “pedophile” for the “sin” of promoting safe sex.  Shame on those who have slandered me. 


I, Christian Peper, have a certificate in sexual counseling.  I have worked with the “mentally ill”.  While working with the “mentally ill” in group homes I have seen first- hand the problems sexual repression have caused.  I have every right to advance the thesis that an unreasonably high age of consent leads to sexual dysfunction and other problems.  I also have a right to advance the thesis that teaching safe sex at an early age saves lives.  I should also be free to state that puberty is the natural age of consent from a clinical, scientific perspective without being illegally slandered or harassed. These cowardly internet vigilantes do not allow any perspective that diverges from their anti-sex, pro-fascist agenda.


Even doctors and high level mental health practitioners are not allowed to comment on the absurdity of the new anti-sex crusade for fear they themselves will be slandered and labeled with the new scarlet letter.  The cowardly internet vigilantes do not care that I have worked with the mentally ill or have a certificate in sexual counseling, what matters is purity and obedience to fascist police sate dogma.  Perhaps with time the internet vigilantes and anti-sex crusaders will be publicly identified and brought to task for their crimes against the children and their promotion of sexual dysfunction and statist repression.  


According to the American Journal Public Health, (98: 155-161, 2008) having sex later in life causes sexual dysfunction.[28]  Men who wait until their 20’s frequently have difficulty getting aroused, reaching orgasm, and suffer from more sexual hang-ups.[29] From prisons dotting the American landscape, to internet vigilantes stifling free speech, to rampant sexual dysfunction infecting and destroying marriages; The cost of sexual repression is simply too high. 


I, Christian (Chris) Peper, have had problems with psychologically based sexual dysfunction due to waiting until I was almost 19 to have sex and being immersed in purity propaganda from the backwards Midwestern Christian churches and schools I was forced to attend as a youth. Because I was cursed (in other societies it would be called a blessing) with high testosterone at the young age of 11 or 12, I had a miserable time growing up indeed.  My unusually high testosterone while I was young caused me to masturbate up to twenty times a day and the purity propaganda I was subjected to at the time prevented me from seeking out sexual partners for about 10 years since I began masturbating in earnest. The fact that I spent my sexual peak never having even kissed anyone romantically has caused me a great deal of pain in my adult life.


Even as an adult many times I go to night clubs and pass up opportunities for sex only to go home and masturbate my self to sleep due to psychologically based sexual dysfunction.  If it was not for Viagra I suspect suicide would have been my best option. I would not wish my childhood on my worst enemy.


If one is to believe the propaganda that one should “wait until marriage to have sex” then why do fifteen to twenty years elapse between physical sexual readiness and official sexual legitimacy.[30]  Is it any wonder that sexual dysfunction pills like Cialis, Viagra and Levitra are such big money makers?  Why are judges, juries, and the criminal justice system punishing those who have slightly younger sexual partners?  It is sad indeed that the totalitarian anti-sex right wing purity movement has done such serious damage to the sexual health of the youth.  The youth do not deserve a lifetime battle with sexual dysfunction no matter how “pure” and “morally superior” the hypocrites in congress may be.


Now that the age of consent has been raised to 18 in many areas, there are more “pedophiles” than ever.  If the age of consent is raised to 21 for premarital sex then the number of new “pedophiles” will be truly staggering indeed.  The word “pedophile” itself has been redefined almost to the point of meaninglessness.


There is debate among psychologists if “pedophiles” exist at all.[31]  A “pedophile” can be anyone from a male college student that masturbates while thinking about a woman under the age of 18 (or 21) to a man who regularly has sex with four year olds.  What if there is no pure “gay” and no pure “straight”?  It is well known that many “straight” men have gay sex in prison.  What is less well known is that many “straight” males continue to have gay sex after leaving prison.[32]  The reader should take note of this timeless quote from the highly revered book entitled: “NYC Sex, How New York City Transformed Sex in America”:


“The way we have organized our sexuality in the western world is not necessarily the way other cultures have organized theirs.”[33]


Because sexuality is far more fluid than most are willing to admit, there is no conclusive proof that a person can physically be attracted only to children.  If a pedophile is defined only as one who is only attracted solely to children, then it is likely “pedophiles” themselves do not exist.


Is a man really “sick” and in need of “treatment” for being attracted to a 17-year-old woman?  What would developed cultures, both modern and ancient, say about the modern American society that arrests and destroys the lives of men for the “sin” of dating a woman who is 17?  Is 17 or even 16 really too young considering that through-out millions of years of evolution (or creation for the scientifically challenged) the natural age of consent has been puberty?  Is it any wonder that when mans laws go against nature then the number of “criminals” naturally increases? This quote from the legendary author, philosopher, and freedom activist Ayn Rand sheds some light on the current American obsession with passing a never ending sea of new laws:


“When there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”


Even within the hated organization known as “NAMBLA”, many members have no want, wish, or desire to engage in sex with individuals under the age of puberty.  In the book published by NAMBLA called “Boys Speak Out on Man/Boy Love”, one can see that all the “boys” that are quoted are past the age of puberty.[34]  One of these so called “boys” is 19-years-old and another is 24.  Very few that argue for elimination of the age of consent laws are really interested in the age of consent going lower that puberty.  It is absurd indeed to accuse a gay civil rights organization like NAMBLA of promoting adult-child sex. While I do not agree with all of NAMBLA’s aims; the purity movement and the “protect the children from sex” movement have left a sea of human misery in their wake.  What is agreed upon by most rational people is the age of consent is far too high.  A recent poll cited in the excellent ABC television special and internet report called “The Age of Consent” with legendary reporter and New York Times bestseller John Stossel found that most Americans feel that 16 should be the age of consent. Because I, Christian Peper, am often misquoted I wish to restate very clearly again that I feel the age of consent should be puberty.  This is a very different and a far more sane position than those that push for total sexual liberation.


Children that are “victims” of incest or adult child sex are coerced to see the incident as far more damaging than it actually was.  I, Christian Peper, experienced this myself with my speech impediment.  I have a slight lisp that most do not notice.  For the longest time I blamed all of my problems on this lisp even though most people do not notice it.  I do admit that some people do indeed notice it, but even in these situations it is far from a pure negative.  I have had complements on my lisp and even had people become more interested in speeches I have given due to the uniqueness of my speech patterns and tone.  When one can blame all of ones problems on something (like relatively harmless sexual contact), especially at societies urging, then one often does.


Most Americans do not question the widely accepted dogma that all adult-child sex is seriously harmful. Although I still feel puberty is a more rational age of sexual consent (if only for logistical and practical reasons); I cannot help but to pay homage to the legendary sexual researcher Alfred Kinsey.  Alfred Kinsey did for sexual research (including safe sex promotion) what Albert Einstein did for physics.  While Alfred Kinsey certainly never promoted adult, prepubescent sex; he brought into serious question the damage sex with young children really causes.  The large number of youth that have been tricked or forced into giving false testimony about sex they enjoyed at the time has filled the prisons with political prisoners.  Alfred Kinsley had this to say about the harmfulness of sexual contact with children:

“It is difficult to understand why a child, except for its cultural conditioning, should be disturbed at having its genitalia touched, or disturbed at seeing the genitalia of other persons, or disturbed at even more specific sexual contacts.  When children are constantly warned by parents and teachers against contacts with adults, and when they receive no explanation of the exact nature of the forbidden contacts, they are ready to become hysterical as soon as any older person approaches… Some of the more experienced students of juvenile problems have come to believe that the emotional reactions of the parents, police officers, and other adults who discover that the child has had such a contact, may disturb the child more seriously that the sexual contacts themselves.”[35]                    


Orwellian governments are established because people are ready to give up their rights for security.  Benjamin Franklin said: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”  Americans, ignorant of history and prone to rash, emotional decisions allow the government to trample on basic civil rights in the name of “protecting the children”. Because the American people find it difficult to follow even simple trains of thought, (due to poor schooling), most Americans equate those that date a slightly younger person with kidnapping and even murder. This allows the government to offer a “solution” to the “problem” of early sexual contact in the form of surveillance and an enlarged police state apparatus.


The technology used on “sexual offenders” is truly frightening.  Already electronic ankle bracelets are used to track and monitor “sexual offenders”.  Many wish to give the “Mark of the Beast”[36] in the form of the VeriChip implantable microchip to all “sex offenders” regardless of what the new definition of child becomes (those under 21 years old?) or what new sex crimes laws (including public urination) are passed. It is conceivable that in the future all those who are deemed to have impure thoughts about those under 18 (or even 21) will be chipped for their thought crime. The anti-sex movement proposed requiring testing of all Americans for their propensity to molest children. Those Americans that refused to take the test would naturally be assumed to be hiding something and would be given a color coded rating that indicates that they have the potential to molest children. Using such instruments as the “penile plethysmograph”, the government claims to have the ability to determine if impure thoughts enter the mind of men when shown pictures of children.[37]  This tool is already used on many convicted “sexual offenders”.  Using this tool on the general population would allow the government to ensure the morality of its subjects are not compromised. 

The government invests millions of dollars aimed at decoding brain activity. [38]As spending continues and neurotechnology advances and the public grows less sophisticated, the most basic civil liberties may become a distant memory.[39]  Already lawmakers in Ohio say that they want to force convicted sex offenders to use a fluorescent-green license plate on their cars so they can be easily identified.[40]  Just as the Nazis required the Jews to wear a yellow star, the people of Ohio want to use license plates to identify those deemed to be “unclean”.


What is the difference between a 17 and an 18 year old? What then, is the difference between having sex with a 15 or 16 year old? Should a couple of year’s difference be grounds for a twenty year, thirty year, or life sentence of registering as a “sexual offender”?  Until very recently, the de facto age of consent in most of America was puberty and shortly after 14. This has been changed due to a rapidly accelerating fascist police state.  It is telling that when a fourteen or fifteen year old commits a crime, he or she is frequently charged as an adult. Prison, sexual repression, and hate have come to define America. 


The show “To Catch a Predator” quite literally entraps men that dare to attempt to display normal urges.  Virtually none of the “under aged” persons are younger than the age of consent in most of the world.  What is even worse about this “show” is experts in sexually stimulating talk are used to lure men into showing up at the location. This show is really about the manufacturing of new criminals.  Contrary to popular belief, there is no real increase in “child” sexual assaults due to the internet.[41]  The following quotes were taken from in which an article titled “Online ‘Predators’ and Their Victims” is summarized.  This article originally appeared in the American Psychologist magazine.[42]


“Finding: Sex assaults on teens fell 52 percent from 1993 to 2005, according to the Justice Department’s National Crime Victimization Survey, the best measure of U.S. crime trends.”The Internet may not be as risky as a lot of other things that parents do without concern, such as driving kids to the mall and leaving them there for two hours,” Wolak said.”

 “Finding: Internet predators don’t hit on the prepubescent children whom pedophiles target. They target adolescents, who have more access to computers, more privacy and more interest in sex and romance, Wolak’s team determined from interviews with investigators.”

“Finding: The means of communication is new, according to Wolak, but most Internet-linked offenses are essentially statutory rape: non-forcible sex crimes against minors too young to consent to sexual relationships with adults.”

“Finding: Most victims meet online offenders face-to-face and go to those meetings expecting to engage in sex.  Nearly three-quarters have sex with partners they met on the Internet more than once.”


The internet scare is due to the media and politicians playing on the fears of uneducated,

less technologically savvy voters that view the rapidly changing times with suspicion and trepidation, much as medieval peasants viewed the thesis that the world was round as “of the devil”.  Is the internet really a “portal to sin” or is it a tool to educate and shine a light on ignorance through writings such as the reader is enjoying now?


The show “To Catch a Predator” portrays teens as asexual and incapable of sexual desire despite a study[43] showing a quarter of 14 year old boys had touched a girls vulva, 85% of teens had kissed romantically, a third of high schoolers in one California study had masturbated someone else[44], and a quarter to a half engaged in heterosexual oral sex. At least half of all high schoolers do not graduate as virgins according to most studies.  Is it really unreasonable for a healthy adult male to be interested in aggressive advances from what he thinks is a highly sexually active individual who has gone through puberty, presents herself as very attractive, and is not only smart enough to operate a computer but also to type long diatribes in an effort to court the so called “perpetrator”. After all, Romeo and Juliet were aged 14 and 13.[45]  Were Romeo and Juliet really asexual? If they were not is it fair to claim that a 17-year-old is?


Minor sex “crimes” like dating someone slightly younger than 18 or briefly fondling someone’s backside even without removing any clothing often leads to long prison sentences with no opportunity for parole or early release.  According to an article from the associated Press entitled “State budget cuts may lead to inmate releases”,[46] budget shortfalls have caused many states to release “tens of thousands of convicts from prison, including drug addicts, thieves, and even violent criminals”.  All states mentioned in the article refused to release sex offenders, no matter how minor their “crimes” preferring instead to release violent offenders.  The article goes on to state: “Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed saving $400 million by releasing more than 22,000 inmates who had less than 20 months remaining on their sentences. Violent and sex offenders would not be eligible.” 


Is a “sex offender” that grabbed the buttocks of a girl in a bar really more dangerous than a violent offender that puts another man in the hospital?  The stories of Arnold Schwarzenegger grabbing the rear ends of women is legendary.  Will the governor turn himself in for his sins and register as a sexual offender?  When Arnold Schwarzenegger was 28 he had sex with a 16-year-old girl.[47]  Why was he never punished for this “sinful” act? Why was he never forced to register as a “sexual offender”?  The United States government has become the spiritual authority for the American people but the rich and powerful (usually) tend to follow a different set of rules and laws than the common man. 


Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the sex crimes witch-hunt is the labeling of children as sexual offenders. The new sexual offender witch hunt that has destroyed countless lives of those that it professes to protect.   Even the very young are declared “witches” and forced to live their lives with the dreaded modern “witch” label and be known as a “sexual offender”. 


Are two teens out on a date both pedophiles for having sexual relations with each other? The law seems to think so.  Many teens have been prosecuted for engaging in consensual sex.[48]  The following quote from Arizona public defender Chris Phillis illustrates how children are actively prosecuted as “sex offenders” (witches) in the “moral and Godly” state of Arizona:  “If a 15-year-old touches a 13-year-old’s breasts, they are now guilty of a felony crime”. These teens are then put on the same sex offender registry as hardened sex offenders who rape young children.[49]  Many feel that these young immoral devils deserve the modern “witch” label so that Christianity and its variations like the “Jehovah Witness Watchtower” and “The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints” in Utah can flourish. 


In Utah a 13-year-old girl has been charged as a sex offender for having consensual sex with 12-year-old boy.[50]  The 13-year-old girl became pregnant after she had consensual sex with a 12-year-old boy.  Both the 12 and the 13-year-old were found guilty of violating a state law prohibiting sex with anyone under 14.  Because the girl committed a single act of “sexual immorality” she is considered both a victim and a sexual offender from the same act.  The 13-year-old girl and the 12-year-old boy have joined the ranks of the new underclass for committing what amounts to consensual premarital sex. 


The guardians of morality and purity relish destroying young lives in the name of “Godly” family values.  Matthew Bates, an assistant Utah attorney general, argued the prosecution was reasonable.[51]  After all, what better way to enforce purity and morality than “busting down” those deemed to be impure?  Unfortunately, it is very common to label even those under 12 as sexual offenders for “playing doctor” or committing other acts that the state has determined to be “immoral”.  The reader should ask themselves if they ever had relations with someone under the age of 18 in their lives, even if they were under 18 at the time.  If so then the reader themselves is considered a “pedophile” by some standards.  Is all premarital sex pedophilia?  Is masturbation before 18 or 21 self pedophilia? Only time will tell, only time will tell. 


Adult male “sex offenders” are often forced to undergo brutal “aversion therapy involving electric shocks.  The dreaded underclass known as “sexual offenders” are often coerced into undergoing “chemical castration” as part of the terms of their “treatment”.  This draconian, brutal, medieval “treatment” is similar to the Nazi programs that neutered those considered “undesirable” in the eyes of the state including Jews, gays, and the disabled.  The ghoulish “authorities” relish giving medically unproven and harmful “treatment” in the form of Depo-Provera shots[52] to the new underclass because these shots not only create sexual apathy and lower the level of testosterone of their victims; but also radically shorten the lifespan of men[53] and cause serous diseases related to premature ageing. 


Brutal, medieval, pseudoscientific “treatment” is also used on children that dare display what the state has labeled “sex offender tendencies”.  A young person does not even have to actually commit any crime to be labeled a “potential sexual offender”. Tests now exist that claim to measure the sexual deviancy of even those as young as 9 and 10 years old to ensure that their morality conforms to dominant American cultural dogma.  The “SEXUAL ADJUSTMENT INVENTORY-JUVENILE SCALE” measures the desire of the youth to determine if he or she is a potential sexual predator.[54]  If the youth exhibits signs of what the courts deem to be unconventional sexual desires the youth faces court mandated counseling and often brutal “treatment” and the loss of such “privileges” as ones drivers license.  The six sex related scales are the Sex Item Truthfulness Scale, Sexual Adjustment Scale, Child (Pedophile) Molest Scale, Sexual Rape Assault Scale, Exhibition Scale, and the Incest Scale. 


Perhaps, with time, all Americans will register as some form of sexual offender.  This was proposed quite recently.  The anti-sex movement wanted to test all Americans for signs of sexual desire for children using a modified form of the “Abel Assessment”[55] combined with electronic testing of ones private organs.  Those immoral Americans that refuse to take the test would be assigned a risk status indicating that they posed some danger to children.  After all, only someone with something to hide would resist the Orwellian police state of America.


Many Americans do indeed enjoy food favored by children like pizza and ice cream.  This could be used as evidence of pedophilia the same way visions and dreams were used as evidence of witchcraft in the 17th century.


The “war on drugs”, the “war on terrorism”, and now the “war on sexual immorality” gives purpose to Americans that need to be a part of bandwagon movements to inject meaning and order into their relatively unimportant lives.  Now, more than ever, we must push at power in this country.[56]


After all, “protecting the children” from the sinfulness of their genitals is well worth living in a police state for most uninformed, ignorant Americans that enjoy jumping on one bandwagon after the next.  Don’t the “children” deserve a better future?  Lets “save the children” from the police state, regardless of what the new definition of “child” becomes. 






[3] “INDIA Chappal, Sticks and Bags” by Meeta Rani Jha

[4] Leslie Feinberg, “1950s witch hunt:: Even McCarthy was gay baited”,

[5] Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors

[6] Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors


[9] Wilhelm Reich, The Mass Psychology of Fascism

[10] Many freedom activists shy away form examining the role of sexual repression in instilling fascism due to fear of ridicule or fear of upsetting their fundamentalist base.

[11] Christian  Peper, “Jehovah Witness New World Order”

[14] Recidivism: It’s Not Open-and-Shut, Rates Vary Widely for Sex Offenders, By Jodie Tillman — Valley News Staff Writer


[15] The Pedophile’s Secret Code, Slate, From:

[16] Some feel the AIDS virus is manmade.

[17] Arguing over what percent is counter productive but I estimate it to be 20%-30%.

[18] Others have a more sinister explanation for the origins of the AIDS virus, namely the government.

[21] See some of Christian Peper’s other work in this area.

[24] Jerry Mazza, Land of the free is world’s top jailer,

[25] Adam Liptak, Inmate Count in U.S. Dwarfs Other Nations’,

[26] Riverfront Times, April 17, 2008

[28] American Journal Public Health, 98: 155-161, 2008, Steve Blechman and Thomas Fahey, “Late Virgins Have More Sexual Problems”,  Fitness RX For Men (May 2008)

[29] American Journal Public Health, 98: 155-161, 2008, Steve Blechman and Thomas Fahey, “Late Virgins Have More Sexual Problems”,  Fitness RX For Men (May 2008)

[30] Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors

[31] Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors

[32] Micha Ramakers, Dirty Pictures: Tom of Finland, Masculinity, and Homosexuality 

[33] NYC SEX How New York City Transformed Sex in America, Museum of Sex

[34] Boys Speak Out on Man/Boy Love, published by NAMBLA

[35] Quoted from: “Treating Child Sex Offenders” and Victims by Anna C. Salter

[36] See Revelation 13 KJV

[37] From: A Dictionary of Psychology  |  Date: 2001  |  Author: ANDREW M. COLMAN



[41] Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors

[42] Wolak and co-researchers, “Online ‘Predators’ and Their Victims”, American Psychologist, The journal of the American Psychological Association  quoted from:

[43] Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors

[44] Judith Levine, Harmful to Minors

[48] JOHN STOSSEL, “Sex, Laws and Politicians” March 14, 2008,

[49] JOHN STOSSEL, “Sex, Laws and Politicians” March 14, 2008,

[51] Pamela Manson, Girl, 13, charged as sex offender and victim, The Salt Lake Tribune

[56] NYC SEX How New York City Transformed Sex in America, Museum of Sex